Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Overfolding against nit aggression

41 Posts
31 Users
9 Reactions
20.7 K Views
double2
Joined: 04.11.2008

Hi guys, itaba posted this hand in Advanced Hand Discussions and I think it deserves a more detailed analysis since it's a common spot, when we have a very strong hand and face agression from a very tight player. Thanks to itaba for posting and thank you all for reading and participating. You can check out the original post here.

Originally posted by itaba
Villain seems like a normal NL50 reg 18/16, low WWSF and low W$SD but small sample 280 hands only, i know im always below at river, i know always a fold at river he have all the big sets. . but what if i instead had TT, or JJ?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://flopturnriver.com

Hero (MP) ($51.56)
CO ($88.07)
Button ($51.71)
SB ($41.72)
BB ($57.19)
UTG ($52.75)

Preflop: Hero is MP with 6, 6
1 fold, Hero raises to $1.25, 1 fold, Button calls $1.25, 1 fold, BB calls $0.75

Flop: ($4) 6, Q, 10 (3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2, Button raises to $7, 1 fold, Hero calls $5

Turn: ($18) J (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $11.45, Hero calls $11.45

River: ($40.90) 2 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $32.01 (All-In), Hero folds

Total pot: $40.90 | Rake: $1.84

Results below:

Spoiler

Button didn't show

My opinion: easy fold turn

So, we have very valuable information on villain. 200 hands is more that enough to say that he is extremely tight pre flop and not agressive post flop. And this makes a world of difference in this hand. We even have a "bonus" factor which is being in a multi way pot. Our opponent is already prone to only be agressive with nut hands, but in a multi-way pot that is even more true.

So, we could make that argument that he also plays like this flop with QTs. That could be true, although I would not take for granted that he calls QTs pre flop BU vs MP's range, that's generally too loose and the close gap between PFR and VPIP shows that villain is not flat-happy pre flop. Also, I do believe that this guy mostly calls with QQ pre flop against MP range, they tend to do that a lot. I also think it's very unlikely for villain to slowplay pre flop AA and then raise flop in a mwp. We don't need equilab to see that if villain only raises QQ/TT on the flop we should be folding right on the flop. But we are not THAT sure that villain does not have QTs in his range, that he never plays KK+ like this and that he never ever plays a hand like KJ like this. So the call on the flop doesn't look terrible to me.

Now, the turn we do really only have a bluffcatcher, villain is not value betting QTs anymore (even if it is in his range flop) and the "miracle" bluff that he makes on the flop now has a pair or a straight a lot of the time, so that doesn't help us either. So if we have a bluffcatcher and villain is not bluffing we have a very easy decision, even with a hand as nutty as a set.

itaba also asks what should we do if we have JJ or TT. Well, JJ should not be in out bet/call range on the flop. We should probably check the flop and if we bet we should fold to the raise. TT is actually a lot stronger than 66, because now we win against 66, which villain absolutely plays like this. In worst case scenario ff villain has all QQ and none of QTs we are in a 50/50 situation which is not terrible, so anything else is a bonus. I would exploitatively play aggressively with TT on the flop, villain is simply not bluffing or thin value betting so no point in slowplaying our hand.

So, what can we learn from this hand:
[*] Even with a small sample of 200 hands, we can make huge adjustments in our game to increase our winrate, if you have the stats you should use them wisely.
[*] Nits don't like bluffing and they don't like thin value betting or raising, so this means that in a lot of spots, facing agression from a nit, you'll find yourself realizing that you have a bluffcatcher, even with a hand as strong as a set. So act as you have a bluffcatcher, and forget the absolute strength of your hand.

Question for you guys, what's the best way to play KJ here?


Reply
Quote
40 replies
Kony76
Joined: 29.10.2010

In a MW pot, our FE decreases a lot, so I don't know if cbetting KJ is a good idea. Mybe playing it passively to try to keep both players on the hand could be an idea.

If we we cbet the turn, and get raisesd like this hand, and assuming the villians's range of 66,TT,QQ, QTs, it could be a b/c. On the turn, that J is bad for our KJ, it decreases a lot our draw strrength and also our possible straight strength. If the river is an A or a 9, we probably will not get more value from the villian's hand, so on the turn I woul fold KJ.


Reply
Quote
gadget51
Joined: 23.06.2008

Doesn't need much looking at, fold flop most times, villain not doing that with AQ. I would bet bigger on flop MW and nitfold to the raise. And turn is easy fold, just so crushed. If I held TT or JJ as the question stands I would play TT the same - that flop raise is death - and not cbet JJ at all. Rightly or wrongly, I can actually nit it up sometimes. :f_ugly:

How to play KJ? Fold preflop; told you I was a nit. :f_drink:


Reply
Quote
nsavov
Joined: 24.09.2010

Check-folding flop is better.


Reply
Quote
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

good analyses.
I would call flop KJ and fold turn because of bad implieds (if we hit straight, it is 4 card straight). If blank would come on turn it would be more a call because of implieds, but it should be very marginal +EV call.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Question: It should be impossible for a nit to win against good players. It is a mathematical fact that you must bluff (among other things) in this game to be a winner. How high up can you find nits? NL100? Higher?

I can only assume that nits to be found higher up actually do bluff - and more than a normal player can get away with once they have entered a pot.


Reply
Quote
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

Originally posted by YohanN7
Question: It should be impossible for a nit to win against good players. It is a mathematical fact that you must bluff (among other things) in this game to be a winner. How high up can you find nits? NL100? Higher?

I can only assume that nits to be found higher up actually do bluff - and more than a normal player can get away with once they have entered a pot.

I think that if you see a nit higher than NL25, he is probably a "fish reg", and since you have fish on all limits, there are also nits everywhere.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Originally posted by GingerKid

Originally posted by YohanN7
Question: It should be impossible for a nit to win against good players. It is a mathematical fact that you must bluff (among other things) in this game to be a winner. How high up can you find nits? NL100? Higher?

I can only assume that nits to be found higher up actually do bluff - and more than a normal player can get away with once they have entered a pot.

I think that if you see a nit higher than NL25, he is probably a "fish reg", and since you have fish on all limits, there are also nits everywhere.

I thought it obvious that my question was; how high up do you have winning nits, or rather, extremely tight players?


Reply
Quote
double2
Joined: 04.11.2008

Originally posted by YohanN7

Originally posted by GingerKid

Originally posted by YohanN7
Question: It should be impossible for a nit to win against good players. It is a mathematical fact that you must bluff (among other things) in this game to be a winner. How high up can you find nits? NL100? Higher?

I can only assume that nits to be found higher up actually do bluff - and more than a normal player can get away with once they have entered a pot.

I think that if you see a nit higher than NL25, he is probably a "fish reg", and since you have fish on all limits, there are also nits everywhere.

I thought it obvious that my question was; how high up do you have winning nits, or rather, extremely tight players?

It really depends on your definition of a nit. If for you a nit is a 18/16 then nits cannot win long run in a 100nl zoom game, maybe not even 50nl.

It's a spectrum, a lot of winning regs at 100nl and even 200nl are not bluffing enough in a lot of spots, and would be tagged as "nits" by a 500nl+ winner.


Reply
Quote
HHHuBi
Joined: 12.12.2013

Now, the turn we do really only have a bluffcatcher, villain is not value betting QTs anymore

Dont you think a lot players can there missread an absolute strength of hand, and still betting QTs, because "I have two pair"? How much average players fold there for example AQ OTT/OTF you think? thx
(I only want understand, why you think he dont betting QTs anymore)


Reply
Quote
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

Never folding 66 here. He could value bet his QTs (he is not gto God but likely so nitty guy is a bad player, overplaying hands). Sure, maybe he is never bluffing here, but we dont know that just according to VPIP and PFR. He could be even raising AA, KK, and even AQ (many such nits dont know what they are doing, and raise to "protect" the pot, I see it quite often). I would fold 66 only if I would have enough sample, to know that he didnt do anything crazy, and that his raise stat is quite low, or AF.


Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Interesting question about how would we play KJ here. With no reads on villains my OR MP range include KJs only. With KdJd I would maybe (I am not sure) just check-call OTF. But with others (KhJh, KcJc. KsJs) I would bet-call since we have some extra equity thanks to BDFD. Either way on the turn we hit our pair, but actually this card is not that great at all for us + hence I think we shouldnt be thunking like "Ha! We improved!". Now we want to get into showdown cheaply, which will be hard to do. Important fact here is the turn card is of a different suite, so none of our KJs hands improved to FD. It is really questionable if we should call on the turn. I would be more happy to call a big net OTT with FD also.


Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Originally posted by Kony76
In a MW pot, our FE decreases a lot, so I don't know if cbetting KJ is a good idea. Mybe playing it passively to try to keep both players on the hand could be an idea.

I don't think our FE in MW pot generally decreases THAT much. But it definitely isn't that low in this case. What I mean by that is villains are going to have a lot of middle and low PPs and they are setmining. More often than not they won't hit their set and more often than not in those cases they will just fold it. Villains will also call with suited hands and there is no FD (only backdoors) possible. That's because I think our FE hasn't decreased that extremely much.

Originally posted by Kony76If we we cbet the turn, and get raisesd like this hand, and assuming the villians's range of 66,TT,QQ, QTs, it could be a b/c.

You actually meant flop, right ? :)


Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Originally posted by nsavov
Check-folding flop is better.

Check-folding with 66 or KJo or KJs or KJ ?


Reply
Quote
msp3101
Joined: 19.04.2016
Reply
Quote
msnek
Joined: 01.10.2008

Originally posted by msp3101
Easy fold pre flop.

Spoiler


Reply
Quote

Why the $1.25 raise? That seems small.

Also, what does this raise tell the villain about hero's holdings?

I'd put hero on:
- AA/KK
- small pair
- Axs


Reply
Quote
DanDule
Joined: 04.08.2008

Why is no one talking about AK? Can't villain have AK also? *going through hh again* OH, the flop raise! That's why he doesn't have AK. :] Solved it myself kthanx


Reply
Quote
Tankas
Joined: 20.07.2014

good topic


Reply
Quote
tmannie
Joined: 09.06.2009

Difficult he could have had from 2 pair to a bigger set , I think both calling or folding is fine, in similar circumstances I have won when villain had 2 pair and also lost when villain had a bigger set.
tmannie


Reply
Quote