Writing is important, important to find the answers to my questions. This is why I write to find out why, not to inform, or help because I am not that smart, however, this process helps me discover information that might not otherwise, be found?
Just writing about whatever that comes to mind, thoughts about, when observing in real time then blends with, concepts away from the table come into a post while gathering qualitative information.
The raw data of 25K of words that come from bullet points and a review of a movie, however, I was just reviewing how to further along information into some formula my game could relate with when playing.
By having triggers on paper to further the thought process from one concept then after experience that comes from conceptual thinking.
This information will transfer into knowing decisions based on how quick I become to gather experience without leaking away bankroll, chips; however a player would categorize loss of value?
Just writing to become better at answering questions set up by writing then transferring into set up play by understanding, comparing, contrasting words that define set up for this to exist in the mind.
Then transform into the moment by the leap of knowing that is and became from what was just a formation of thought until it came out onto paper?
Is this not similar to how thought of knowing or simply knowing by how we use our path of learning as steps to form our scenarios at the table by observation that repeat themselves?
Because as we learn we merely just repeat decisions based on certain board textures then the opposite when other board textures have us merely repeat other decisions?
Nine players, pre flop, all go to the flop, nine players, three base decisions, check, fold, bet, this equals 81 decisions total, 27 possible, different, on each street, from three streets of play based on one player having three decisions on each street, each player having an option of decisions in each hand if played to the river.
The total amount of decisions will go down as people are eliminated from the hand, can a player then have all the sub decisions based on the natural man using their own formula to then impact the outcome by how they perceive their own image versus the perspective they have of what the opponent(s) have of their image as well as how the player sees their opponent(s) image?
How does this affect the base 81decisions of a full table, of, for future outcomes?
As information is used by deeper knowledge of people about how they make decisions over X amount of time?
Especially when the brain does its best work up to three hours then after this mark the brains decisions is based on how we each deal with adversity?
Poker is process oriented for my game by having the understanding that each player posses the freedom to express their actions each in their own way.
This is why I am always researching to become better at influencing the outcome into my favor, an edge built by the formula of what is?
