hey.... just recently saw a video of TwiceT and Vonki playing and analyzing NL50 SH and there was one hand i got really confused
(pink performance, part 8, min 2:30)
went like this:
hero is UTG, villain is MP
Preflop:
hero has A♣A♠
hero raises to $1.50, MP calls, SB calls
Flop:( $4.75) K♥2♥2♣, 3-handed
SB checks, Hero bets $3.75, MP calls, SB folds
Turn: ($11.88) 8♠ 2-handed
Hero bets $9.37, MP calls
River: ($29.67) 2♠ 2-handed
Hero?? ($32 left eff)
and all they consider is overjamming river or betting like $20 on the river or c/r river
which imo just absolutely makes no sense to me.....
ur getting it in vs Kx anyways, but there are other parts of his range that you have to consider, mostly
- 99-QQ, which are always checking back river (if u go for a c/r) and NEVER calling an overjam
- busted FD's which are never calling river obv as well
isnt by far the best option to bet like $11 otr? 99-QQ are almost always crycalling this sizing imo + Kx is always jamming here, so we dont lose value vs Kx this way, but we def lose value against underpair by overjamming river ourselves, cuz he never ever ever calls an overbet with this part of range
also some missed FD's possible in his range vs which we get no value by overbetting, but our $11 sizing might make him spazz and jam trying to fold out underpairs maybe...?
really confused i see literally no argument for betting river that huge.
can someone explain this to me? am i mmissing something here?
thanks