Nl 200 Zoom 88

I don't like it. either fold or 4b bigger. you induce a call with that sizing and that means that you'll have to play post on too many ugly boards for your hand.
If that guy seems like a light 3bettor a good strategy to fight him back would be to open tighter and expand 4b value range. imo 88 is close but like i said before if i decided to go ahead and go broke with it just make it bigger and let him decide if he wants to fold or shove.
As played not sure if like the bet or not since it's a board he can have draws to jam with so yeah i guess i like c/f better.

i think 4bet size is perfect while oop and a little bit deep

flop: just check fold
the only hand u can make him fold is AQ, and with that cbet size even AQ would like to float u

if i'm gonna bet i 'd make it 60,but i think check fold would be better

Originally posted by ttjjboy
i think 4bet size is perfect while oop and a little bit deep

Didn't notice we are 122 deep but that's only a better argument for making it bigger. you wena decrease the spr and the positional advantage when u are oop.
tbh with 122 bb eff, i rather just fold in this spot.

in 250hands
vs a guy 3bet to sb 60%

if i would fold to his 3bet with 88, should i fold AQ ?
how abt fold prf with AQ 88? cuz he would 3bet~~ And I am not able to 4bet

Originally posted by ttjjboy
in 250hands
vs a guy 3bet to sb 60%

if i would fold to his 3bet with 88, should i fold AQ ?
how abt fold prf with AQ 88? cuz he would 3bet~~ And I am not able to 4bet

play around with stove, you'll see equity difference between the two.

Originally posted by maya1984

Originally posted by ttjjboy
in 250hands
vs a guy 3bet to sb 60%

if i would fold to his 3bet with 88, should i fold AQ ?
how abt fold prf with AQ 88? cuz he would 3bet~~ And I am not able to 4bet

play around with stove, you'll see equity difference between the two.

no offence but people cant bluff with the stove in the form

Originally posted by maya1984

Originally posted by ttjjboy
i think 4bet size is perfect while oop and a little bit deep

Didn't notice we are 122 deep but that's only a better argument for making it bigger. you wena decrease the spr and the positional advantage when u are oop.
tbh with 122 bb eff, i rather just fold in this spot.

I also think 4betsize is good, it's already quite big. I also like to 4bet it here. I guess I would also cbet a KTx board, like the sizing.

i would have bet 42-44 on the 4b and play postflop just like you but betting like 1/3 like 30-36

call with 88 unless you have dynamic against him that he's shoving AX and random crap.

This board is interesting. I think betting small sucks cos he never folds his gutshots (and he connects here like always on this board). Halfpotting may get you folds from gutshots.

I think just tank forever on flop and check/fold. He might think twice about betting with AQ and thus you might get to showdown anyway and win some small % of the time. Better than betting and losing more money

I might cbet KTX board but KT7 is so different, assuming he's not super loose, I think he connects with it all the time.
AJ/AQ/QJs/ATs/98s/87s/T9s and so many other random hands. Of course he shouldn't be 3betting many of the mid connectors and broadways in position but it depends on how he plays these hands. With that said I don't think many people flat hands like K5s in position so I think his hand range should be more suited connector heavy because your 4bet was a little on the larger side.

Hey,

Think this is played really well pre flop, post flop I'd just go and c/f, I imagine we are going to get jammed on/defended against a bunch and c-betting is probably lighting money on fire here.