Hi guys,
I am forwarding a message to the English Community from Dominik "Korn" Kofert:
Our recent news release on the de-tracking of all PokerStrategy.com members at Full Tilt Poker and the follow-up news on the changes Full Tilt is making to their incentive scheme has generated a lot of support, but also criticism from the community.
One of the negative points raised was that our reaction to the Full Tilt Poker de-tracking was different from our reaction to problems with other poker rooms.
In this statement we will address the criticism.
PokerStrategy.com's business model is based on receiving advertisement commissions from poker rooms. This is why we can offer our community, education and all other benefits free of charge to the users. This is also the reason why PokerStrategy.com exists and has so far taught online poker to more than 1.6 million real money players.
The reason for PokerStrategy.com's existence is also its weakness: in order to receive commissions from a poker room, we must enter into an advertisement agreement. Those agreements generally require that we promote the poker room and place restrictions on negative coverage. Thus, when a partnership ends, even if it does so under questionable circumstances, we are often unable to give our public opinion about it and are restricted to taking action behind the scenes.
The Full Tilt de-tracking situation, however, is different in that the new Full Tilt Poker chose not to be bound by the previous contract with PokerStrategy.com.
Without such a contract in place we can voice our opinion about Full Tilt's move and transparently inform all affected users about the consequences which this has for them.
We disagree with Full Tilt’s decision for the following reasons:
1) We have incurred considerable costs and efforts to generate new players for the old Full Tilt. The new Full Tilt is using the same software, the same brand and the same player database as the old one. We directly contributed to the success that the new Full Tilt will have. That they can do so and generate significant profits from it without us getting any form of compensation is - in our view – unfair, disregarding whether it is legal or not.
2) 485,000 PokerStrategy.com players are now de-tracked. PokerStrategy.com depends on its players, and we must stand up for them where we legally can. De-tracking means no more poker education for the affected players. It also means lower income for PokerStrategy.com, less profit and less money that PokerStrategy.com can invest into poker education, promotions or marketing. It is a lose-lose situation.
This is a controversial matter and which we have given our opinion above. We do not expect everybody to agree with us and look forward to a constructive debate.
Find the old discussion thread and an overview of previously answered questions here.
Ingrid