Jj

Hand discussions for No Limit

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 14 years ago

2 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

279 Views

RSS

_Anonymous_

28.11.2012, 00:36 0

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $0.05(BB) Replayer
SB ($5.65)
BB ($5.07)
UTG ($8.58)
UTG+1 ($9.64)
Hero ($7.63)
BTN ($9.48)

Dealt to Hero J♠ J♣

fold, UTG+1 raises to $0.15, Hero calls $0.15, fold, fold, BB raises to $0.62, UTG+1 calls $0.47, Hero calls $0.47

FLOP ($1.88) A♠ 4♣ 7♦

BB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero checks

TURN ($1.88) A♠ 4♣ 7♦ 6♠

BB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $0.75, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $0.75

RIVER ($3.38) A♠ 4♣ 7♦ 6♠ 5♦

UTG+1 checks, Hero checks

UTG+1 shows 5♠ 5♣
(Pre 18%, Flop 13.2%, Turn 22.7%)

Hero shows J♠ J♣
(Pre 82%, Flop 86.8%, Turn 77.3%)

UTG+1 wins $3.16

UTG+1

Quote

1 reply

_Anonymous_

28.11.2012, 00:59 0

Hi Dracsharp,

Preflop: Since UTG+1 called the 3-bet we get better odds to set mine, and we are IP and deep with him. So calling is fine.

Flop: Once BB checks he almost never has an Ax hand (other than maybe AA) although UTG+1 can still have that. We can't really bet the flop for value and we don't really need to protect because we are either way ahead or way behind.

Turn: Once both check again it's now more clear that BB and UTG+1 don't really have a hand. So i want to bet to get some thin value from weaker pairs. Our bet size is fine but we could also bet a bit larger, ~1/2 pot.

River: On the river we now lose to 55 and 88 so the only hands we may get value from are 99 and TT. And since 99 and TT would not always call (while 55 and 88 would call or raise) I like the check back. Betting would be too thin.

Quote