Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Known players:
[tg]BU$38.00:///////;SB$14.28:///////;BB$22.63:///////;MP2$5.28:///////;MP3$9.77:///////;CO (Hero)$10.05:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is CO with A:c, Q:s.
2 folds, Hero raises to $0.30, BU raises to $0.80, 2 folds, Hero raises to $2.40, BU folds, Hero gets uncalled bet back.
Final Pot: $0.95.
villain is 20/18 with an 11% 3bet over about 60 hands.
the reasons why i decided to 4bet are because..
a) i didn't look at how small a sample i had - i just assumed i had an okay hand count so i saw his 3bet stat and thought he has a ton of air in his range especially BU vs CO.
b) i believe he will continue only with AK and QQ+, so given that my hand has blockers to these it will make my 4bet bluff more successful.
c) since i'm only going broke here with AK and QQ+, AQ is one of the best hands that i will fold so i turn it into a bluff.
im not too sure about the theory behind this...
i've seen how people are more than happy to go broke in CO v BU with even JJ+ and AQ+ given the aggro preflop dynamic between these positions. my problem is in justifying this at nl10 by assuming i have decent equity with JJ/AQ vs a BU stackoff range. what i mean is i might need ~40% equity in order to call a 5bet ship but the thing is i don't think i've ever seen any non-fishy player stack off with <AK/QQ+ without any history which means if i 4bet with AQ and get shipped on, i should just fold since i only have ~25% equity.
is my reasoning for 4betting okay here? and can i 4bet bluff successfully with AQ without having to call a ship or do you think i should be bluffing with trashier hands that aren't necessarily at the top of my folding range? if so then i don't understand which of these two are right:
1) 4bet bluff with trashy hands containing blockers
2) 4bet bluff with the top of our folding range
ty!