Against loosepassive fish, Should i bet bigger on river? And we B/f river right?
Microgaming - €20+2|10/20 NL (2 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
Hero (BB): 1,475
SB: 1,525
SB posts SB 10, Hero posts BB 20
Pre Flop: (pot: 30) Hero has A♣ K♦
SB calls 10, Hero raises to 65, SB calls 45
Flop: (130, 2 players) 4♥ K♥ 2♦
Hero bets 75, SB calls 75
Turn: (280, 2 players) Q♠
Hero bets 190, SB calls 190
River: (660, 2 players) T♦
Hero bets 230
If villain is not likely to spazz out i would bet bigger on the flop already , because his calling range is quite insensitive to your betsize I guess (its not like if you bet 20 less he is suddenly gonna call q hi floats)
if we bet 100 on the F , T pot is 330. Then we bet like 240 , R pot is like 810 .
River is then a hard one , because chb means missing value , and bet-folding Really really sucks.
Another problem is I have absolutly no idea what to put in his limp-calling range , neither do I have any intel on him.
W/o info i would ch b , because it won't ever be a big ev mistake + we get alot of intel (does he chc fd? what is his limp-calling range? does he chc tpwk? does he trap good hands (2P/sets) )
Secondly chking back keeps our stack ok to play if we lose , while bet-folding renders us in a very bad spot stackwise.
I think the EV of getting the intel+ keeping a decent stack vs the fish if we lose is higher then the EV of the bet in chipvalue , therefore I would ch R
