hello again!
thx for previous answer. can you give me some comment on my next issue?
my plan in my poker skill development now is to try to figure out regs. i always had a strong fundamentals of the game, and with fish hunting i was doing ok. but if i want to get better and at least brake even with good regs i need more than that. i guess i need to learn how to play against individual reg. (MUCH EASIER SAID THAN DONE) And for that i need to figure out their tendencies...how do they like to play certain spots, witch of them tends to exploit me, and witch just play their standard game. how good this regs really are? how many of them are making notes of my play, and are adjusting to me?
ive always treated every reg more or less the same (except pree flop...the differences are obvious there - specially with help of HUD), but post flop my play was more or less the same against all regs.
im playing here (speed nl100) from start of this year now, and for the last 1-2 month ive really tried to pay attention to what everyone was doing and trying to make notes that makes sense. there are about 20-30 regs here that i constantly play against, and i have at least some notes on most of them, but still it seems so hard to figure out witch regs are really good, witch are bad, witch ones are thinking regs, and witch are more autopiloting, witch tends to exploit me, and witch treats me same as everyone else, and so on...i also must say that trying to think about all this things while also trying to be a bit looser and a bit more aggressive is pretty exhausting, frustrating, and i tend to spew more cause of that, so its also more tilty. so i sometimes think is this really worth it? isnt it better to just play abc and try not to make to big mistakes?
i guess you (and all the better players) know your opponents really well (at least the ones you play much against). so, can you give any general advice/tips/directions on how to get to know your opponents better(and adjust to that accordingly)? (besides play play play, always think about what are they doing, and making notes)
anyway...this is the hand i just played
speed nl100 6max, effective stack: 100bb
pree flop:
MP opens 3, i call from SB with T :diamond:T 
Flop ($7.00): 6 :spade:5 :diamond:8 
i check, he bets 5, i raise to 12, he calls
Turn ($31,00): 6 :spade:5 :diamond:8 6 
i check, he bets 21, i call
River ($73,00): 6 :spade:5 :diamond:8 6 :diamond:4 
i check, he checks
he shows J :heart:Q
villain is a 25/20/3 reg with 50% fold to cbet raise
flop is not standard (i usually donk in this spot), but this time i check to get his cbet, and to see how he responds to x/r on dry boards.
so, what have i learned from this?
-is it ok to assume, that this villain doesnt give much credit to my x/r on dry boards, so in future i can x/r more flops for value against him?
-or maybe i cant assume nothing because my x/r was to small and he just called cause i gave him a good price.
-you think this hand was played ok?
-what kind of a note would you make based on his play, or you think this spot isnt worth making any note? (i made note: "against flop x/r: on dry boards defends with overcards, and bluff turn when i x")
tnx, and i hope your brains dont hurt while reading this 
I have a suspicion that at NL10 I would have Jammed the AK hand which makes me think "why NL10 and not NL16? Am i money scared?"