Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL50 SH: 22 preflop

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
237 Views
Kruppe
Joined: 20.02.2008

I think I called because BB seemed pretty aggro postflop.

Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;SB$162,35:139/14/11/7,0/11/16/86/100;BB$90,30:203/17/16/5,5/42/22/88/60;MP2$51,50:90/24/20/3,3/11/28/100/100;MP3$56,65:139/20/17/1,7/22/25/86/0;CO$53,45:115/13/12/-/25/14/100/100;Hero$54,30:///////;[/tg]
0,25/0,5 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.58 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is BU with 2♠, 2♦
MP2 folds, MP3 raises to $1,75, CO folds, Hero calls $1,75, SB folds, BB raises to $7,75, MP3 folds, Hero calls $6,00.

Flop: ($17,50) 6♦, 2♥, 7♠ (2 players)
BB bets $13,00, Hero calls $13,00.

Turn: ($43,50) 5♥ (2 players)
BB bets $69,55 (All-In), Hero calls $33,55, BB gets uncalled bet back..

River: ($110,60) 2♣

Final Pot: $110,60


2 replies
salflip
Joined: 02.10.2007

I personally would have called the initial raise and then folded to the 3bet
I doubt you have the implieds to call for set value imo

Post flop I like the play against an aggressive opponent such as this one

NH!


crt32
Joined: 17.02.2007

You should fold to the 3-bet. Calling a 3-bet for set value with 100BB stacks is -EV.