To Zoom or not to zoom?

Learning to Win

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 13 years ago

3 Posts

3 Users

0 Reactions

622 Views

RSS

DecMate

Joined: 25.01.2009

Posts: 1,868

10.01.2014, 19:35 0

Hey everyone, my names Declan and i'm just getting back into poker after stopping for a year+.
I'm jumping straight back into NL25, i used to be break-even playing NL25 Shorthanded Zoom.

Now, coming back to it i'm going to give full ring a try as i've read up lots of things, people saying that it's much better when it comes to getting raked. And the extra 2BB/100 can be the line between profit/breakeven.

BUT the question i have is, should i play NL25 Full-Ring Zoom, or just non-zoom normal tables?

I want:
Pro's
Con's
You're personal opinion
What you play
your stats
Your BB/hr

I don't ask for much. Thanks guys.

Quote

2 replies

UPAY4DINNER

Joined: 28.09.2009

Posts: 22,746

12.01.2014, 11:01 0

Hey Dec,

I think you'll find that most of our grinders are SH players so this is probably why there has been no response here

Quote

_Anonymous_

12.01.2014, 11:11 0

I've played both and my answer to you would be to try both and decide which you like better

Pro's - more hands per hour, you can play short sessions
Con's - harder game (lower bb/100) and more tiring
You're personal opinion - I play normal tables because I like to play really long sessions, it helps to play less hands/hr so I don't get tired
What you play - 100-400nl
your stats - don't want to say
Your BB/hr - not sure

Quote