nutflush facing shove on paired R

think i would still bet turn, as played... i dunno people do limp call PP's alot but i have no idea why he wouldn't raise a 6 on the flop unless it was 56

I would probably fold R. His sizing looks as FH+ or air. I´m not happy to play guessing game about 120bb. It´s true that it would make sense to raise flop with set but villain who limp preflop don´t do things which make sense everytime.

I would fold river too. Maybe some of the times we will face a weaker hand but still on NL2 I do not want to go AI in this situation.

+1 - makes no sense, but when we call he will show like that one combo of 56 he's got

it's worse for us because we check the turn we feel obliged to call it

We are not obliged to do anything, It is up to us and our judgement. Plus we are not pot commited yet.

I would bet the turn with the nut flushdraw when probably Ace would be good, too. As played, I would rather fold without the nuts there.

Definitely bet turn. You have no fold equity, but you're also ahead of a lot of hands that have good equity against you. JT, 87, KJ, lower flush draws are all calling another bet.

He probably doesn't have QQ given the limp-call pre, but who knows? 99/66/65 are his most likely hands and there's very few combos of these. Plus, he's limping at NL2 so we have what I like to call "Retard Equity", which is the equity we get when it's not implausible that he just shows up here with A4o or some crap.

I'm calling and tapping the table when he shows me 66.

Alright, so i can bet the turn for value here against these types of opponent? Also this is the first time i heard about "retard equity" it's a funny concept

ps: this particular villain makes this call very profitable i think

But i should be aware that this is maybe one of those rare occasions where villain is spewing money and will try to not make such calls very often (readless). Thanks for the advice.