I know the difference between 3betting and squeezing, but Alleen86 said "The reason is the same as it is with 3betting", from which I understood he was also 3betting the same range. Maybe that's a mistake, idk, but I was interested to know what people thought about 3betting that range. You've said it's "perfect" OOP, which is helpful, so thank you for that.
Now I think about it, I can see that I've been going a bit wrong in that the high playability of SCs actually makes them comparatively good hands to be playing OOP.
If you have 76s and the board is A45r J8, wouldn't you try to go AI?
I'd certainly try, but I don't expect to get paid unless villain happens to have hit some 2P or set. So what I'm saying is that understand MJPerry's point about the stack:pot ratio, but it's a bit academic when the villain folds to our turn raise (or whatever). And yes, I realise that a 1% chance of winning 100BB is an EV of +1BB, but to get paid we need both to hit a monster and for villain to hit something he's willing to stack off, so it seems a really long shot.
Any way, I'm certainly willing to try flatting it. I suppose I need to check whether there are active squeezers behind?
If it's not too personal a question, what are you 3betting IP? Apart from KQo, obviously.
