And thats the case w the situation I mentioned. It would be correct adding this hand to our stacking off range.
Notifications
Clear all
Will you provide us with equilab calculations how 99 is a +EV play-for-stacks move here?
Does ppl at NL10 really have that wide 5bet shove range, QQ+,AK?
PS. Villain must be a supermegafish to do this with A8 or 99?
Anyway... my point was that YES, we can extend our stacking off range pretty much vs the kind of fish I said in the earlier post. Extending this conversation ll make no good for the given hand, as what I said was an illustration of adaptation at the tables.
Afulibador, you should put some figures , else you are just writing nonsense.
Even vs a that wide range you are bad:
MP2 47.55% 47.02% 0.53% 9d9h
MP3 52.45% 51.92% 0.53% 99+, A8s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, AJo+, KJo+, QJo
Reasons like: it is like this, cause I say it, are not worth it... Do the numbers...
Man, this is not the range at all... well, I think u never found a guy who is really donating money, and dont know how to adjust against him.
Man, how can u give a range if the guy isnt even thinking when playing poker? Is just making fool moves at the tables, instead?
Originally posted by Afulibador
Man, how can u give a range if the guy isnt even thinking when playing poker? Is just making fool moves at the tables, instead?
You are saying that spewmonkeysuperfish will 5bet shove any 2? I think nitrols range for megafish's 5bet shove range looks pretty realistic.. If villain is playing with very short stack he could do it with low suited connectors sometimes but not often enough.
Originally posted by la55i
You are saying that spewmonkeysuperfish will 5bet shove any 2?
Yes, I m saying that. If he is conservative in some way, he is not a spewmonkeysuperfish.
This is the stupidest thread of 2016 and it's only January 8.
The Artist Formerly Known as PokerStrategy.com's Online Editor 