Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

AQs – facing 4bet shove

21 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
1,247 Views
thebaptist333
Joined: 13.01.2009

Poker Stars $0.02/$0.05 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players - View hand 2849432
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

BTN: $5.33
Hero (SB): $38.47
BB: $3.33
UTG: $7.67
UTG+1: $2.99
UTG+2: $2.29
MP1: $2.86
MP2: $1.52
CO: $5.13

Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is SB with Q :heart: A :heart:
UTG raises to $0.12, UTG+1 calls $0.12, 2 folds, MP2 calls $0.12, CO calls $0.12, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.10, 4 folds, CO raises to $5.13 all in, Hero calls $4.03

Flop: ($10.67) K :club: K :heart: 8 :club: (2 players - 1 is all in)

Turn: ($10.67) 7 :heart: (2 players - 1 is all in)

River: ($10.67) 4 :club: (2 players - 1 is all in)

This is actually very similar to another hand I posted. This time I did squeeze, and the CO 4bet shoves.

I think I should probably fold here, but it just makes no sense that he would call the initial raise, then shove. If he had a premium hand, he's more likely to 3bet himself.

It felt to my like he just wanted to play this hand and he got upset that someone was 3betting. I think the only hand he might have here that has me crushed is AK.

At this level, what do you think players are taking this line with?


Reply
Quote
20 replies
kriko92
Joined: 16.11.2010

Seems like a call to me. He will show up with low/medium PPs mostly and AQs plays fine against that. Yes, sometimes he might show up with AK that he decided not to squeeze for some reason but this will be compensated by the times he turns out to be a fish and shows you some Ax/KQ/random stuff. I don't play fullring though so wait to see other opinions too.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

I think we should fold. Villain can do this with TT+ ,AQ.
But even vs 77+ ,AQ we have just 44%.
We cannot exclude the high pairs as players on this limit love to call/push with them.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

77+, AQ+ looks kind of realistic. I'm not quite sure if it is better to fold or call but neither of those are bad imo. There is already money in the pot so do we need more than 44% to call?


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

If we have 44% equity, this is a call. The pot odds here is about 37,76%.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

I am not sure villain will do this with 99-77.
At least not often.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Villain might be doing an old school perfectly viable play (though I doubt it=) ), namely "deep limping or overlimping with AA". If the blinds are squeeze happy, then it might be quite profitable. If they do not squeeze, the plan would be to play the rest as if holding a small pair (because too many are in).


Reply
Quote

Personally, I think once he shoves, it's an easy lay down. AQ, even if it's suited, is not the type of hand you want to risk your whole stack.


Reply
Quote
MJPerry
Joined: 03.10.2011

Originally posted by nitrol
I think we should fold. Villain can do this with TT+ ,AQ.
But even vs 77+ ,AQ we have just 44%.
We cannot exclude the high pairs as players on this limit love to call/push with them.

How does our equity change if we have AK? I'm at work and don't have Equilab on this laptop.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Originally posted by MJPerry

Originally posted by nitrol
...I'm at work and don't have Equilab on this laptop.

MJ, you know your boss has already warned you several times by now... Better get back at work:pcuser:


Reply
Quote
MJPerry
Joined: 03.10.2011

Eh, my job is poker content. It's tangentially related.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Originally posted by MJPerry

Originally posted by nitrol
I think we should fold. Villain can do this with TT+ ,AQ.
But even vs 77+ ,AQ we have just 44%.
We cannot exclude the high pairs as players on this limit love to call/push with them.

How does our equity change if we have AK? I'm at work and don't have Equilab on this laptop.

With AK we get 48,6%.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

Above 40 equity we can call call almost anything based on pot odds. Not much difference from 44 to 48 about the line we ll choose based on that info.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

Originally posted by YohanN7
Villain might be doing an old school perfectly viable play (though I doubt it=) ), namely "deep limping or overlimping with AA". If the blinds are squeeze happy, then it might be quite profitable. If they do not squeeze, the plan would be to play the rest as if holding a small pair (because too many are in).

At NL5 I think we ll have a hard time trying to find these squeeze happy guys. About limping and playing like a common pair I think its kind of a poor line to take w aces, imo. Gives too much chance to any playable hand that calls pre realize equity against us.


Reply
Quote
xxnub
Joined: 04.12.2007

I think villain did a great job because initial UTG raise was small and to be able to play for whole stack he need big 3B PF but this will rise the alarms so he was hopping that somebody else will do that for him. Even Hero Pf 3B is not standard it is way to big 0.7 will do the same job as his 1.1. When you have so much callers sometime is better just to call because chances that somebody is trapping are huge.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

xxnub, u are saying this believing he did had aces, right? But actually we dont know yet _tongue:


Reply
Quote
tennajkrajsi
Joined: 05.06.2015

call all day all night

he will never have AK


Reply
Quote
xxnub
Joined: 04.12.2007

Afulibador we as a TAGs are also exploitable we like to isolate limpers squeeze and so on...and I think somebody observant can easy see that our hero likes to squeeze and play pairs TT+ or AK like that.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

I still think that a regular TAG is not that squeeze happy at those limits. And, just like happened yesterday against me w a similar hand, villain here could 4bet shove just cause got upset when having a decent hand and didnt wanted to fold it vs a raise, like 99-JJ (in my hand villain had nines when he 4bet shoved over my squeeze).


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

What kind of player was your villain? What stats does he have?


Reply
Quote