Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

JTs bottom 2 pair on KJT in 3bet pot with initiative

42 Posts
10 Users
1 Reactions
4,162 Views
SPeedFANat1c
Joined: 04.01.2009

PokerStars - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 100 BB
SB: 133.8 BB
Hero (BB): 131.4 BB
UTG: 170.8 BB
MP: 522.6 BB
CO: 100 BB

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has T♦ J♦

fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 2.4 BB, fold, Hero raises to 8.4 BB, BTN calls 6 BB

Flop: (17.2 BB, 2 players) T♠ K♥ J♣
Hero checks, BTN bets 10.4 BB, Hero calls 10.4 BB

Turn: (38 BB, 2 players) 4♥
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: (38 BB, 2 players) 6♣
Hero bets 32 BB, fold

Hero wins 36.4 BB

Unknown reg.

In game there was too much action and I forgot I am in 3bet pot, I thought I was flatting pre.

But I guess it might be cbet here, cause there are worse hands which can call, like AJ. There are also many hands which are better than ours. ANd if he raises, I have to call still. I cannot get in probably because I will just isolate againt better range. QUestion is - are even somebody raising here with a semibluf. For example if they have QK, they can call. QJ can call. AT maybe raise/fold? T9s, 98s (weak oesd), 87s. Proabably after cbet its bluffcatch.


Reply
Quote
41 replies
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

U could cbet this flop. Many worse can call.
When he raises, if he is capable of doing it w drawing hands or not depends on how aggro he is posflop.


Reply
Quote
kriko92
Joined: 16.11.2010

Originally posted by SPeedFANat1c
QUestion is - are even somebody raising here with a semibluf. For example if they have QK, they can call. QJ can call. AT maybe raise/fold? T9s, 98s (weak oesd), 87s. Proabably after cbet its bluffcatch.

I don't expect nl5 regs to bluffraise this flop at all. Your range is just too strong in their eyes, when faced with a cbet here he will be trying to choose between calling and folding.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

And why do you 3bet preflop?
I like to cbet on this flop. You will get raises from better hands.


Reply
Quote
MJPerry
Joined: 03.10.2011

Originally posted by nitrol
And why do you 3bet preflop?
I like yo cbet on this flop. You will get raises from better hands.

I don't mind not cbetting, but I'm wondering if it's better to get value from pair+gutshot hands and KQ etc that might check behind?


Reply
Quote
Tinsley15
Joined: 18.07.2013

on a rainbow board i am more inclined to x/c otf rather than donk here.

otr i would go for much smaller sizing.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Originally posted by MJPerry

Originally posted by nitrol
And why do you 3bet preflop?
I like yo cbet on this flop. You will get raises from better hands.

I don't mind not cbetting, but I'm wondering if it's better to get value from pair+gutshot hands and KQ etc that might check behind?

That is exactly the case. Though we should be very cautious vs aggression.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

I wouldn't 3bet this pre, for me it is just a call. OTF I would cbet. Many weaker hands will call.


Reply
Quote
MJPerry
Joined: 03.10.2011

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by MJPerry

Originally posted by nitrol
And why do you 3bet preflop?
I like yo cbet on this flop. You will get raises from better hands.

I don't mind not cbetting, but I'm wondering if it's better to get value from pair+gutshot hands and KQ etc that might check behind?

That is exactly the case. Though we should be very cautious vs aggression.

Ah sorry I thought you meant "I like no cbet" rather than "I like to cbet". Yeah I think if we're raised on the flop it's pretty grim.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

I corrected it, so no misunderstandings more. :)


Reply
Quote

You played this hand really well, I think. I love suited connectors and J10 is my favorite. The only thing that I would have done differently is, I would have just called the raise pre flop. Other than that, I would have played it the same way you did.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

MrPink, flatting here I think its absolutely fine. I would do the same, btw.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

I don't mind not cbetting, but I'm wondering if it's better to get value from pair+gutshot hands and KQ etc that might check behind?

I think many hands like KQs, JQs are surely calling, but not betting. Interesting that when I putted them on equilab, we are fliping (slightly losing, about 49,1-49,7). So we dont have a value bet against them. Worse would also call?


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Do not look the EV of a certain hand. Look at equity of a range.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

Man, if u read carefully u ll see that my point is different w this post.
KQ, for example, appeared in discussion like one hand that would be behind, and we could actually value bet vs this holding.
Not what I found on equilab. U already knew that we were actually behind vs those hands?


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

This does not change anything much as we look at the whole range, man...


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

Thats information. And not a common one, I would say.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

We will be more willing to obtain info about the equity of his whole range. And that's where we should focus.


Reply
Quote
Afulibador
Joined: 21.08.2009

If u say we should focus on a range, bring us one. I would like to see it _thumbsup:


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

No, no. I am not a waiter or a servant to BRING you beer whenever you want.
I know it is hard for you yo come up with a solid range but you have to try and figure it out, show us and then we can discuss. :)


Reply
Quote