AQ33ds - bottom set.

I would play this hand the same as PLO fish. We don’t have much outs if we are behind and he can easy have a straight or better set with flush outs as well.

Cheers,
SDK1987

How does 47/44 show up with 66/44 here? Or 75? If he's decent, there's a low probability of him having nutted hands in his range. If he's below decent, there's way higher likelihood of him having JJ84r or QT64s to take this line...

"MP seemed to be recreational, but playing a few tables
MP: 47/44, Ag 3.0"

MP is a recreational player playing too many hands. I'd say there's a very decent probability of him having both sets and straights here.

4way, I don't think even the bad players pot there with JJ84/QT64. At least I haven't probably ~ever seen that happening, unless the potter is a complete maniac (100/100/100 stats).

Originally posted by Tim64
"MP seemed to be recreational, but playing a few tables
MP: 47/44, Ag 3.0"

MP is a recreational player playing too many hands. I'd say there's a very decent probability of him having both sets and straights here.

I think I assumed based on the "he's playing a few tables" that he's likely not a whale but rather a decent but maybe too loose player. He's not flatting much, so i wouldn't assume he has many low wraps/pairs in his range. I think a hand like AA is much more likely. Player with such a small vpip/pfr -gap shouldn't really have much of a flatting range against outside of the BB.

That said, maybe his 3b is actually close to zero, which changes my whole analysis