STT leakfinders

Seems pretty solid to me. Good use of position and defending BB pretty actively. Could use SB open limping to have wider range from SB and cbet flop seems bit low. But that can work nicely also to have stronger check range.

Thanks ghaleon

I do complete the SB a little bit but maybe I could do it more frequently, it gives 46 VPIP, what's yours like?

HU phase bothers me a bit, it's been easy at $1.00 and $3.00 but at $5.00 I'm getting crushed so far
I know It's only a 100 SNGs sample for the $5.00 but the difference is definetely noticable.

@adasko99 Your data and stats look nice , i would put some suggestions if they were more tournaments of 0.50$ and under but you play mainly higher stakes so my suggestions won't be relevant for the pool of players you face. A suggestion that might help you to find your possible leaks is to separate SNGs from SNGs with bounties. In my opinion you probably don't play them the same way or if so it's probably a mistake.
You can also make a report by position and adding a stack size filter.
It will also help you to find and identify potential problems in a specific position at a specific phase of the game.
Additionnally you can also filter the games by number of players (remaining players).
Also for SNGs the ITM% and ROI% becomes relevent once you gather atleast 3K to 4K tournaments (if possible of the same stake or close to).
You can also do a report of all the players you played with. Compare the average stats to yours.
Check who are the players who won the most against you and take a look at their stats.
The more data you collect, The more accurate Stats / Graphs and reports will be.
Obviously don't take all my suggests to the letter i'm simply a micro-stake players with a low volume of game ( when health allow me to play).

Best of Skills & Luck @ Tables,
OldSchoolPapa.

Hi OldSchoolPapa and thanks for your input

separate SNGs from SNGs with bounties. In my opinion you probably don't play them the same way or if so it's probably a mistake.

I adjust a bit, like in the bounty ones, people ISO-3bet-jam vs all-in shorts a bit wider,c ause they want the bounty, so i call their 3betsjams a bit wider than usual, but that's pretty much it i think when it comes to me adjusting

You can also make a report by position and adding a stack size filter.
It will also help you to find and identify potential problems in a specific position at a specific phase of the game.
Additionnally you can also filter the games by number of players (remaining players).

Do you maybe know how to do all that in Poker Tracker 4?

You're welcome.
Hard for me to explain in english how to do it but you have the option to add custom filters and register those filters so you can use them anytime you want.
On Youtube you will find plenty videos about PT4 leak finding , custom filters ...
It's better to look there to learn how to do it for a more accurate insight. That's where i learned to do it myself.
With a video it's much easier to understand/reproduce and you might even learn few more tricks about PT4, filters and reports.
If you ever have a problem to find it on youtube send me a private message i'll look for the video link, i might still have it on my laptop bookmarks.

Best of Skills & Luck @ Tables,
OldSchoolPapa.

Thanks a lot man I will definitely look into it
Hit me up if you need anything

No prob, always happy when i can give a little help to PokerStrategy's poker players. :f_thumbsup::f_thumbsup::f_thumbsup:
Have fun at tables and Keep on grinding hard !

I think I sort of did it
I know it's a small sample but I can definitely see that after crushing $3.00 and below, I'm having problems at $5.00 and I wonder why :f_biggrin:.
Bubbling a ton and getting crushed HU

It's a comparison of 9-Man Turbo Bounty STTs,
Top section: $3.00 (357 tourneys)
Bottom section: $5.00 (117 tourneys)

players left:

stack sizes:

Since it's not a stake i know, i think more advanced players can give you better advices about the why or better strategies to adopt.
On the other side you can start looking into the hands you played in the situations you might have leaks and check if that was just setup hands, bad timing or bad reads on your opponents. If your opponents were regulars or recreatives. If you see the same patterns repeating and causing losses...
Since the sample is low i wouldn't worry too much but like i said you can look deeper into it more easily now.
Also if you have doubts on some hands / situations or stats interpretations the best is to post it in the dedicated section, i'm sure some play on the same stakes and can give you more clues/ideas. Also i see that between 6-7 players there's a gap in your stats that might explain a little the why. Between 2-3 Players i think you can still review the hands you played but you need atleast to double up the sample to have a better overview. Also for those stakes HRC or tools alike can help.
Makes me want to play poker

Thanks man I appreciate it

It will give more value to you most likely to post some of problem hands into hand analyzing area than to analyze stats on these low samples. I don't think you have big leaks that can be seen from these at least.

In general SB total VPIP should be closer to 70-80% than 50% in unopened pots. Especially versus weaker opponents who are usually folding too much to raises and not playing aggressive versus SB limp.

Thanks, I will look into it

Good Job Adasko99 , Fantastic indeed.
Keep it up

Not doing so good at $5.00+, been breakeven for 600 SNGs
I've looked into BB graphs for every blind level, any thoughts anyone?