In 601766 hands I played on poker stars cash games I have Avg All-in Equity 58.93% and My C All-in adj is -$5835.25 and My C Won is -$3210.29
Can someone explane this stats?
Not sure with limit you are playing, but the basic stats like VPIP, PFR and 3bet% are also interesting stats to know. It looks like you aren't running well when you are all-inn based on the all-inn equity.
Cheers,
SDK1987
thanks, mainly I play 0.5Nl
For example in 0.5 nl fast 6(max) I played 229520 hands.
avg all in equity 60.8%
my C all-in adj by all in equity -$3086.97
I am sick of poker stars
The fact that your "C All-in adj" stat is a lower amount than your "My C Won" means you are running bad.
Looks like despite you are getting the money in with AVG All-in equity of 60%, you are maybe losing bigger pots than the pots you are winning.
Might be worth filtering on hands that you lost where you weren't all-in, but did have a 100BB+ pot for example.
actually, hero is running way above EV. the problem isn't in the flips (flipping god actually), it's just that hero isn't beating the games
I have import omaha hands to poker tracker
0.5 PL HI FAST (6max) 38873 hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -2046,43 , avg all in equity 53.13
0.5 PL HI (6max) 3124 hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -503.81, avg all in equity 50.83
0.25 PL HI FAST (6max) 12609hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -467.42, avg all in equity 53.54
0.25 ante 0.03 PL HI FAST (6max) 8383 hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -283.65,avg all in equity 52.49
0.25 PL HI (6max) 1766 hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -167.87,avg all in equity 51.09
0.5 ante 0.01 PL HI (6max) 59 hands, net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity is -21.08,avg all in equity 69.39
This are all the stakes that I played in omaha games. I lost -2689.51$.
I dont understand this two stats (net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity and avg all in equity)?
How can I lose money if I have all in equity higher then 50% and how is net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity -3491.56?
In each stake that I play omaha my all in equity is in the blue and my adj. is in red?
Please someone explaine?
Hi marac79,
Can we see the graphs?
Usually in PT4 graphs, the blue line is showdown winnings, the red line is non-showdown winnings and your winning is shown in green.
The all-in-adjusted EV is your EV at the time you were all-in.
If you win less than your equity, it means that overall your opponents beat you, but you got it in good.
Winning more is normal, since if you win with 85% equity, you still win 100% of the pot.
Generally the two lines track fairly close over tens of thousands of hands.
Please answer my a simple question if My avg. all in equity is higher then 50% should my net won in My currency adjusted by all in equity in large number of hands be in - or +? Yes or no?
My Currency All-in Equity Adjusted
from PokerTracker4 Stats definition
Amount of money won in the preferred currency set in PokerTracker when adjusting all-in pots. In those pots instead of attributing real results, this statistic attributes to the player the equity they had in the pot at the time of the all in. Pots where players call the all-in bet or raise but later fold (hence their cards are not known) are not adjusted.Formula: Amount Won in My Currency Adjusted by All-In Equity
All-in Equity
from PokerTracker4 Stats definition
Average amount of equity that a player had at the time they went all-in in all hands where this information is known.Formula: (Preflop Equity + Flop Equity + Turn Equity + River Equity) / (Number of Times Player Was All-In Preflop + Number of Times Player Was All-In on the Flop + Number of Times Player Was All-In on the Turn + Number of Times Player Was All-In on the River)
Even after reading both of those, I can answer your question with certainty.
what your average all-in equity is doesn't matter at all.
$EVadjusted (My Currency All-In Equity Adjusted) is only about each player's equity share when all players were all-in.
so, if you have $50 effective stacks and get it in with KK vs AA (let's call it 20% equity, and ignore blinds and rake for the sake of simplicity), you have an expected loss of:
50*0.2 - 50*0.8 = 10 - 40 = -30
so, -$30 is your $-EVadjusted, regardless of how the runout goes.
the actual result, however, is either +$50 (get lucky) or -$50 (not), assuming no run it twice/cashout. that's where the difference between $Won and $EVadjusted comes from.
a few more examples without any math:
- if you get it in for a $100 pot with 20% equity ten times, and manage to suck out four out of those ten times, you have won more than your 20% share - thus, the $Won will be higher than the $EVadjusted (though both lines will still be negative, assuming you contributed to about half the pot).
- same goes for the other way around. if the opponent had 10% equity, but you ran it ten times and they sucked out three... you still won money, but villain got more than his "fair share" - thus the $Won will be lower than the $EVadjusted.
thus, if your $Won (My Currency Won) is higher than your $EVadjusted (My Currency All-In Equity Adjusted), you've been running hot, as far as all-in runouts are concerned. it doesn't matter if you were the favourite or not.
of course, you might have been unlucky in other aspects - maybe you're running AK into AA all the time, your good hands don't get paid, whatever. but that has nothing to do with $Won compared to $EVadjusted.
what your avg all-in equity being above 50% says is that, when you go into an all-in situation, you're usually not the underdog.
that's nice and all, but you might be still losing money outside of all-in situations - folding too much, calling too light, whatever. those not all-in situations still count towards your bottom line - as you surely know, the $Won and $EVadjusted lines only diverge on all-in situations.
Thanks. I will stop playing this game.
I played it for years on poker stars. My leak tracker is ok. I would say that I am ok player but I lost more then 20000$.
The site gets my all the time on flops,turns and rivers, all ins, cant flop nothing.....
I have more then 1200000 hands played and I knew that I am playing against fixed machine. I played it to much that I can predict what is going to happen. I am going to study my hands and hope that I can back it up.
Sorry for bad english and thanks again.
yeah, whatever the reason for your losses is, it seems very clear that you aren't making a profit in those games in the long run. best of luck.