small raise of course. that's happened when you try opponents to call with not strong hand
Notifications
Clear all
With this info, you don't have pot odds to call even on the flop. KJ is bet-call, check-fold obv.
I would exploitatively play aggressively with TT on the flop, villain is simply not bluffing or thin value betting so no point in slowplaying our hand.
I can't understand this. Even if he have sometimes something different from set (very optimistic), he can fold on the flop. Or on the turn...And we are not sure about 66. We are not sure for our 52-53%. We can't fold obv with TT, but we can't raise with this equity. I mean probably bigger than 50%, probably smaller than 50%, in the end equal to 50%. Simple as that. Imo...
Hey Lazar35,
Welcome to PokerStrategy.com 
Where are you from? In fact, why don't you get yourself added to our Member map. You never know, the nearest PokerStrategist may live right next door. 
What games and limits do you play? We should be able to link you to some strategy and/or videos specific to what you play. 
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. 
Have fun 
Laz
What nobody wrote about, is that Hero answered to Button's raise with call and later he checked on the turn. This line bet/call flop + check turn looks reckless!!!
If somebody raise than I need to think, even use bank time. That's a poker players job to think here.
Button is a super nit with better hands on flop than mine set of 6 -> Hero bets 2 euro, Button raises to 7 euro, Hero folds
Button is a nit but I still have better hand than he -> Hero bets 2 euro, Button raises to 7 euro, Hero raises to 20 euro with intention to call all-in
Button is a nit but I am able to fight with him on next barrel -> Hero bets 2 euro, Button raises to 7 euro, Hero calls 5 euro + Hero knows that whatever card will show up on the turn, he will bet again on the turn.
Betting 2 euro to the 4 euro pot is a weak form of invitation to next barrels. We suppose to get at least one call and we should to bet again on turn into higher pot. The problem is that pumping pot isn't our intention if we are not sure about our holdings. However, if we decide to bet 4 euro in first instance, we are putting our hands on range. Betting 100% pot multiway with obvious nit involved sounds powerful, also it's cheaper to bet 4 euro than to bet 2 euro + calling 5 euro + calling 11.45 euro.
If Button raises from our 4 euro to 14 euro than this move costs him twice and it allows us to resign in this very moment with only 5.25 euro lost total. We expect to get such a raise only if Button beat us. Instead of betting 2 euro reckless we can bet 4 euro for information. And now we know that this information is comperatively cheap as opponents can not be aware that we are gonna fold in case of further action.
KJ would be almost always a check raise, since the nit is mostly set mining, and always bluffs and never really calls vs reraises and will almost always fold, unless of course he has a monster then, i wouldn't invest anymore money, calling a reraise or ship it, is certainly a bad idea vs this kind of player
if he calls then its an easy bet on the turn 3/4 then shove the river, he would probably make 1 call with AQ maybe 2 very unlikley to call a river shove, as long as he isnt pot comitted
Hi monika1401,
Welcome to PokerStrategy.com
You are quite welcome to post in the English forum, but please post in English.
If necessary, you can translate to English using Google Translate before posting.
Thanks!
VS
I think post flop he is protecting something like QT QJ because he maybe expects you have AK , AA. On the turn when he maybe hits doubles and seeing that is committed to the pot keeps betting to finish all in on the river.
Good luck on the tables !
Eu nu inteleg de ce a platit pe turn, dar pe acel 2 renunța ? ...a platit cu gândul Ca o sa intre ?