AA vs 3bet on wet board

Normally I would go broke on the flop with a 3bet shove for value and protection against a unknown with the nut flush blocker. Offcourse villains raise is huge, but tough to give villain credit for only better hands.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Originally posted by SDK1987
Normally I would go broke on the flop with a 3bet shove for value and protection against a unknown with the nut flush blocker.

Would the same apply for this board?

PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.02/$0.05 - 6 players
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker

UTG: $5.05 (101 bb)
MP: $13.97 (279 bb)
CO (Hero): $5.33 (107 bb)
BU: $5.05 (101 bb)
SB: $3.93 (79 bb)
BB: $7.07 (141 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero is CO with K♥ K♣
2 players fold, Hero raises to $0.15, 1 fold, SB calls $0.13, BB calls $0.10

Flop: ($0.45) 2♠ 3♥ 2♥ (3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $0.29, SB raises to $0.58, BB folds, Hero ??

could you check, how much your c-bet gets raised in % ?

I also prefer to go bet/broke on the AA hand on the flop on nl5, i dont like the bet/calling option when he raises quite big. if i call then maybe x/c.

The KK hand i would cbet for half pot maybe having the K of heart, there is no need to go over half pot imo.
In position i think against that x/r i think its an easy call on the flop, but ofcourse it depends on the villain.
They might get it in with FDs so in that case reraising/getting it in is probably not the worst option.

I might prefer folding to the flop bet in hand 1. Villain is betting roughly 3x pot and we hold a single pair, I don’t mind just folding without reads. His value hands are sets and Q9s, he might not even play his best single paried Qx this way.. and hands like AQ probably 3-bet pre

The board is little wet.

If he hit set, he dominates you significantly, but you are competetive against 2pair Q9.
He often has TPTK, flush/str8 draw. He can slowplay KK.

I would shove on his big re-raise on the flop, presuming you have no history on that guy. You may have some fold equity too.

Originally posted by mjez1

Originally posted by SDK1987
Normally I would go broke on the flop with a 3bet shove for value and protection against a unknown with the nut flush blocker.

Would the same apply for this board?

PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.02/$0.05 - 6 players
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker

UTG: $5.05 (101 bb)
MP: $13.97 (279 bb)
CO (Hero): $5.33 (107 bb)
BU: $5.05 (101 bb)
SB: $3.93 (79 bb)
BB: $7.07 (141 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero is CO with K♥ K♣
2 players fold, Hero raises to $0.15, 1 fold, SB calls $0.13, BB calls $0.10

Flop: ($0.45) 2♠ 3♥ 2♥ (3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $0.29, SB raises to $0.58, BB folds, Hero ??

I would go broke here as well against a short stack with a 3bet shove. It seems unlikely villain has hit this board and villian can play a over pair the same way as well.

Is this hand a similar pattern, is this shove ok?

PokerStars Zoom, Hold'em No Limit - $0.02/$0.05 - 6 players
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker

UTG: $4.27 (85 bb)
MP: $7.63 (153 bb)
CO: $5.00 (100 bb)
BU: $5.15 (103 bb)
SB (Hero): $5.96 (119 bb)
BB: $9.41 (188 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero is SB with A♠ A♥
2 players fold, CO raises to $0.12, 1 fold, Hero 3-bets to $0.55, BB calls $0.50, 1 fold

Flop: ($1.22) K♣ 8♥ 8♣ (2 players)
Hero bets $5.41 (all-in), BB calls $5.41