[Closed] NLHE 6max the softest?

Less winning players makes it the softest?

That's interesting logic, i look at it the exact opposite, less winning players means it's harder to win as less people can do it. Also might mean the skill level in players is more tightly distributed so less people beat the rake.

I don't NECESSARILY see it as oh there's less winning players therefore there are less good players i need to beat.

But basically i think those stats are nonsense in determining which are softest. Those figures are "misleading" (for lack of a better word) and i think are a result of simply the effect of rake considering that most people think that only 5-10% of people are winning poker players which i am inclined to agree with, although i can't explain it.

Although i remember seeing similar figures in my database when i used PT2.

Pretty much i think we can draw very little from these stats.

Wait what... 40% winning players?

Seems like there's no money HU....

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Seems like there's no money HU....

ofcourse there is, heads up requires more skill then any other game in my opinion. A good player would crush those fish Although luck is also a big factor in heads up games..

Originally posted by Hahaownedlolz

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Seems like there's no money HU....

ofcourse there is, heads up requires more skill then any other game in my opinion. A good player would crush those fish Although luck is also a big factor in heads up games..

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS

Originally posted by Hahaownedlolz

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Seems like there's no money HU....

ofcourse there is, heads up requires more skill then any other game in my opinion. A good player would crush those fish Although luck is also a big factor in heads up games..

wp ♦

Well the database is made of players that played more than 1000 hands..

1000 hands is no sample at all.. That means such a short-term stats dont really say us anything..

If you make the statistics of players that played 10 hands then 50% players will be winners and 50% loosers because there is no skill involved. (without counting the rake)

If every player would play 100k hands then its possible you gonna get about 15-20% winnings players.

I hope what i wrote makes sense ♦

Originally posted by peche025
We analyzed $50NL, $100NL and $200NL players across all sites that played over 1,000 hands in 2010.

do I need to add anything?

edit: good timing JQ

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS

Originally posted by Hahaownedlolz

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Seems like there's no money HU....

ofcourse there is, heads up requires more skill then any other game in my opinion. A good player would crush those fish Although luck is also a big factor in heads up games..