[Closed] How big a sample should be to determine a correct ROI for 180Man?

Tournaments

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 16 years ago

6 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

1,033 Views

RSS

Alverine

Joined: 31.01.2009

Posts: 719

22.01.2010, 04:14 0

Hey mates,

Im currently grinding the 18, 45 and 180Man. I already have a steady up line on the 18's, a good line upward on the 45's, but the 180Man i dont even know if im a winning player. Here's my graph:

BI: $2,20 tourney, Profit: $183,24 ROI: 18,5%

Should I wait till I have like 2k sng to make ANY conclusions?

I really dont wanna grind these $2,20 anymore. I'm starting with the $12, witch is the next level. I do have the bank to play these comfortably, but i still will lose way too much money if I found out to be a loosing player :f_cry:

5 replies

richard1817

Joined: 11.02.2008

Posts: 355

24.01.2010, 15:34 0

MTT 45+ are very swingy. So yes a 2k sample would be more appropraite.

Superturbo nit at Pokerstars

It has been awhile... Back to the hypers with SNE plan

NickParkes

Joined: 07.07.2008

Posts: 1,526

25.01.2010, 14:54 0

Yeah, a big sample is needed to see anything for certain... But if you have the BR for the $12s, play the $12s... I don`t see the point in super-grinding a limit you are over-rolled for "just to see if you are beating it"... that's what BRM is for... move up when you can, move down if you have to, and at some point in the future you can say you have beaten any level you don't have to return to :f_p: