hi,
this really is kind of an awkward spot because the bubble-factors in this kind of payout-structure are HUGE (and the blinds are that high). but i'm pretty sure folding is superior to shoving here.
there are many factors which let me lean towards the fold:
- as already said: ICM! you lose so much $EV by busting out in comparison to the relatively small benefit of doubling up here. you are on rank 20 right now so your chance to make it is already quite decent. since i don't have all stacks of the tourney, i can't make an exact ICM analysis, but i tried to approximate the situation by 5 places paid - 7 left and you are in 5th place (i did not insert the exact stacks on your table since the situation in the overall tourney is more relevant - important to me were mainly the stacks of bu - sb - bb and the fact that there's one other stack smaller than you)
http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/icmcalculator.html
Level: 4000.0/8000.0/800.0
Structure: 0.2/0.2/0.2/0.2/0.2
Players: 7
Runtime: 117ms [300 Iterations]
Player Stack Push% EQPre EQPost EQDiff
UTG 26540.0 9.4% 0.1582 0.1634 0.00527
UTG+1 54000.0 9.7% 0.1887 0.1906 0.00188
UTG+2 12345.0 7.5% 0.1004 0.1043 0.00388
CO 50000.0 22.9% 0.1866 0.1888 0.00215
BU 16400.0 15.4% 0.1234 0.1295 0.0061
SB 8500.0 100.0% 0.0739 0.0603 -0.0136
BB 32000.0 0.1688 0.1631 -0.00568
according to Nash you could push something like:
55+ A5s+ A8o+ KTs+ KJo+
so in this approximation you should fold K9o.
And for the following reasons, this nash-range is imo even too loose for this spot:
- the BB. optimally (nash) he should still fold quite a lot here. but many players just see the odds and aren't aware of that. especially in a freeroll
- the future game. you're on the button and there will be probably some players (on other tables) auto-all-in before you are. and there are also always a lot of players who don't understand bubble-situations in satellites and will bust out incorrectly which favors your chance of making it ITM.
- the payout-structure: the payout-structure i used in the calculation will most likely create smaller bubble-factors than the real one.
so overall folding would've been better here.