Originally posted by rubysilesia
I would bet 2/3rd pot because I would cbet the same having over cards. This way I'm not readable.
why do you bet 2/3 with overcards?
Originally posted by rubysilesia
I would bet 2/3rd pot because I would cbet the same having over cards. This way I'm not readable.
why do you bet 2/3 with overcards?
Originally posted by rubysilesia
2/3rd pot on the flop, 1/2 pot on the turn and small value bet on the river (the same size as on the turn).
By using this betting pattern I'll be putting around 3/5 of my stack in the middle (or UTG entire stack), and IMO, I'll be completely disregarding pot control here (in a situation I think shouldn't).
Helemaalmicks line makes more sense to me, he's controlling the size of the pot and somewhat protecting his hand. But I like more betting between 2/3 to 3/4 on the flop and checking the turn. I think I accomplish the same thing as in helemaalnicks' line.
Originally posted by helemaalnicks
Originally posted by rubysilesia
I would bet 2/3rd pot because I would cbet the same having over cards. This way I'm not readable.why do you bet 2/3 with overcards?
Good odds no one hit a jack and will fold. It works like this on low limits more often than not.
I prefer betting at least 2/3rd pot on the flop and on the turn it depends on the opponents. Bet/fold turn is one opportunity and check turn, call river for pot control. On NL 10 the players are more loose than tight and I like to valuebet more if I'm ahead (no problem playing big pots with overpair:D) I think that on NL 20 the situation should be the same.