Skip to forum
micro FR vs SH
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] micro FR vs SH

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1,438 Views
sinsas
Joined: 22.09.2009

Hello guys, I started playing at stars in mid June and made transition from tournaments to cash games

I am currently playing NL10 sh 6tables w some shots ant NL25 sh (4tables) and I ran pretty good making 500+$ in ~37k hands (yep i know my volume sucks )
For some reason i chose to play SH and not FR, maybe for more action and more poker like game, because you can play more hands than in FR. But as my hand history kept growing, I noticed that there is pretty much regs at the tables, more often than not they are pretty bad, but others are somewhat decent for these micro stakes.

So if any of you guys play up to NL50 FR/SH on stars maybe you know which FR or SH has more regs, fishes, random players that are not that good ?

any response is appreciated :spade:


4 replies
thazar
Joined: 14.09.2009

IMO you will find more regs on FR tables than on SH. The fish likes action and generally will prefer a SH table.

;)

Thazar


Wriggers
Joined: 21.07.2009

What thazar said is completely correct. I actually moved to SH on Stars because there were just too many regs on my NL25/NL50 FR tables. You find a lot more fish on the SH games and it's a lot more fun than FR. After transitioning to SH I can't even imagine moving back


sinsas
Joined: 22.09.2009

Then, my first choice might be the correct one, I'll just keep grinding SH then.

GL at the tables guys, and thanks for reply.


w0rm24
Joined: 10.04.2011

Yeah I much prefer SH, there's always at least one guy at the table with stats of 85/0 or something. Once you find him, you've got yourself a little cash machine :)