I'm not sure what to make of the hearing. On one hand, I was kinda bummed that no new idea was revealed. Not that I was expecting any new info. I think if Full Tilt Poker pays the AGCC fees that's a good thing. Why pay fees if there's no chance of them getting back online. I also think the fact that they've pushed the hearing to a later date is a good thing. Selling Full Tilt Poker will take some time. They've obviously got lots to figure out.
I still think whoever buys Full Tilt will be getting a good deal. Bad press aside, it was reported that Full Tilt generated like a billion dollars last year. Even after you cut that in half (no more US players), and subtract operational cost, there's definitely money to be made. Plus, Full Tilt Poker is widely regarded as the best poker software in the business.
I also think that the new owners will be looked at as heros by some (if the deal requires them to pay back US players), who've come in and saved the day. Without new owners players don't get paid, with new owners they do. Obviously, some players will never trust Full Tilt Poker again. My stance is, how can you blame new owners for mistakes made by the old owners, especially when the new owners are the ones paying back US players.