Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;BB$2:31/16/6/2.0/33/25/67/100;Hero$1.89:///////;[/tg]
0.01/0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.102 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is BU with Q♦, J♠
5 folds, Hero raises to $0.08, SB folds, BB calls $0.06.
Flop: ($0.17) A♥, K♥, T♣ (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.
Turn: ($0.17) A♣ (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.
River: ($0.17) 6♦ (2 players)
BB bets $0.08, Hero raises to $0.24, BB raises to $1.92 (All-In), Hero calls $1.57 (All-In).
Final Pot: $3.90
Results follow (highlight to see):
Hero shows (Qd Js)
BB shows a full-house, sixes full of aces (6s 6c)
BB wins with a full-house, sixes full of aces (6s 6c)
Clearly I shouldn't have called his all-in, think I got tunnel vision for a second. My real question is though, should I have played more aggressively at the flop & turn? I figured I had the nuts so didn't want to scare him out of betting, but did I do myself a disservice by letting him get free cards to try and make his full house?