nl5 - tt

Hand discussions for No Limit

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 15 years ago

2 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

213 Views

RSS

fr3ak1n6

Joined: 22.03.2011

Posts: 31

17.12.2011, 16:54 0

Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;UTG1$4.49:34/35/9/0.4/30/0/100/67;CO$3.87:273/23/15/3.4/22/35/100/36;Hero$4.8:///////;[/tg]
0.02/0.05 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.105 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is BU with T♥, T♦
UTG1 calls $0.05, 4 folds, CO raises to $0.20, Hero raises to $0.60, 3 folds, CO calls $0.40.

Flop: ($1.32) A♠, 9♥, 8♥ (2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $0.88, CO raises to $1.76, Hero folds, CO gets uncalled bet back.

Final Pot: $3.08

Quote

1 reply

_Anonymous_

17.12.2011, 19:04 0

Preflop: I'd prefer to actually call, unless the blinds 3bet too much (which will probably almost never be the case in NL5). If he 4bets we are in bad shape; if we call, we'll have absolute position with a decent stack to manoeuvre.

Since you decided for the 3bet, I'd do it bigger, like $0.70.

Postflop: You could even consider checking behind. But cbetting is fine too as we are so far away from showdown and you might have some fold equity against JJ. But that's about it.

What else do you think is his range? I mean... JJ beat us, 99 and 88 got there, Ax beat us and won't fold.

Once we bet and get raised folding is the only option. From time to time he might bluff us (I don't quite believe it but still; I think semibluffs there might be more common, even though there aren't many in his range), but we have nothing to do about it. We can't get it in with second pair on a 3bet pot A high connected board.

Quote