This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

The Theory Battle Voting Thread - Lackoogcb vs Uri Peleg

  • Poll
    • Who Do You Pick as The Winner?

      • 39
      • 17
      Total: 56 Votes
    • Boomer2k10
      Joined: 22.09.2010 Posts: 2,551
      Hi Guys

      This is the official thread for feedback on the Theory Battle between Lackoogcb and Sirrybob


      In this series we will be pitting the best coaches has to offer against each other in a battle of theory and poker philosophy to crown our first Theory Battle champion.

      In the first battle our newest Diamond coach Lackoogcb, a 600-1kNL regular and Black Member takes on one of the most exploitatively minded coaches we have in Uri "sirrybob" Peleg

      You can see examples of both our participants' work in the video section


      Who do you think made the best showing out of our two coaches and deserves the title of Theory Champion, why and who would you like to see take part in the Theory Battle in the future?
  • 8 replies
    • Lucker9200
      Joined: 18.06.2010 Posts: 271
      Really great series :) , keep them coming :f_cool: .
      For the first match I would consider it a draw and give each one of them a point. I think they both did very well and I would love to see more from both of them.
      To be more specific the way I would rate their performance:
      Q1 - 1:1
      Q2 - 1:0 (more explanations on who to use it against and how and more open mindedness I guess)
      Q3 - 0:1 (more productive answer that could be easily put into practice and closer to my opinion to some extent I guess)
    • LemOn36
      Joined: 07.02.2009 Posts: 1,949
      Watching now
      Next one is obvious - mblm vs Pleno1
    • luizsilveira
      Joined: 27.11.2010 Posts: 2,320
      The idea for this video is absolutely awesome. I'm very excited about it.

      My main impression is that much would be gained by intercalating both coaches. That'd be easier and clearer, both for the battle and for the theory bits. So, for example: look at postflop for coach 1 and then coach 2. Then turn for coach 1 and then coach 2. So on. Otherwise it takes way too long to come back and forth.

      Smaller things that this could help also is that the video felt a bit too slow at times, it could be more dynamic; and that it's rather long. So if you are not watching the whole thing at once, it'd be best to have the different spots at a time so you could watch each spot rather than having once coach at a time.

      Keep it up!
    • LemOn36
      Joined: 07.02.2009 Posts: 1,949
      Yeah let the dudes get together at least at the end. Didn't mind the pacing, although if the guys had time to prepare and knew all the questions and would just come with clear cut answers it'd be better saving some delay time
    • x3mwisp
      Joined: 31.03.2009 Posts: 3,604
      Actually I prefer them not to be prepared for the questions - That way you could actually see the decision making process.

      Awesome series, haven't listened with so much attention for some time.
    • BattleHunter
      Joined: 12.11.2009 Posts: 880
      I love this series, can't wait to see it grow into a "thing" :f_biggrin:

      They both had solid arguments. I guess I give a slight edge to Sirrybob, mainly on a biased basis (my views for Q3 are similar to his)
    • Laci24
      Joined: 07.10.2009 Posts: 6,144
      I really like the series! :)

      Next one is pleno vs Internet :)
    • GoOnCal1
      Joined: 22.01.2015 Posts: 590
      Argumentum ad populum