BB and CO are both total unknowns, assumed to be on the loose and passive side. SB is a 29/7 with zero 3-bet after 150 hands.
I'd fold my hand to a pot 3-bet from BB but because I got min-raised + have the button I think it's a call.
SB has AA** the vast majority of the time and against such a range I have 35%. I feel like he probably has on the weaker side of aces and will hardly show up with very premium AA** as he probably just 3-bets them instead of overcalling so maybe my equity is a bit better than that.
Villain has 6$ behind after his 4-bet and the SPR on the flop is going to be ultra-low. I can't realise my full equity given that I'm not calling it off on any flop.
Is the fact he has so little money behind a GOOD thing for us in that we need low equity to go with it postflop OR because we have less implied odds we'd rather call this pre knowing that we get an extra PSB out of him when we can go with it? I'm leaning towards it being a good thing given that if he had zero $ behind after the 4-bet we'd call given we have 35%+ and need 33%
PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha, $0.25 BB (5 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
Hero (Button) ($25.75)
SB ($15.07)
BB ($51.63)
UTG ($23.39)
MP ($14.51)
Preflop: Hero is Button with Q
, 2
, J
, K
1 fold, MP calls $0.25, Hero bets $1, SB calls $0.90, BB raises to $1.75, MP calls $1.50, Hero calls $0.75, SB raises to $8.75, 2 folds, Hero ???
