Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:
$0.05/$0.1 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
Known players:
[tg]CO$17.06:///////;BU (Hero)$10.40:///////;SB$12.26:///////;BB$21.15:///////;MP3$9.27:///////;[/tg]
Preflop: Hero is BU with K:s, A:c.
MP3 calls $0.10, CO folds, Hero raises to $0.45, SB raises to $1.30, 2 folds, Hero raises to $3.00, SB calls $1.70.
Flop: ($6.2) 9:d, T:c, 4:d (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.
Turn: ($6.2) 6:d (2 players)
SB bets $2.96, Hero folds, SB gets uncalled bet back.
Final Pot: $6.2.
Villain's stats:
Spoiler
1. If I have AK, QQ+ [34 combos] in this spot, which I think I have, then
on the flop I can cbet: QQ+ [18 combos] and A :diamond:K [1 combo].
That means I have a cbet: 19/34 = 55% of the time, which is not that tragic at all.
2. Let's look at his stats:
He has a big 3Bet % on the BB, so I can probably go broke even with TT+, AK [46 combos]
I can cbet: TT+ [30 combos] and A :diamond:K [1 combo]
I have a cbet: 31/46 = 67% of the time
Q: I think, I should use 2nd range, based on his 3Bet in BB.
Do you agree?
Q: My 4bet size is OK?
Q: I think i never check back this flop with made hands, because the board is DHB.
What about T94r? Can I check hack with whole range = TT+, AK, so I could induce his T floats OOP? A and K would def suck for my QQ or JJ, then, but my whole range doesn't suffer much.
Unless we have really good table dynamics here which we have seen. Stats usually ain't that correct for the given sample size. So do you think he was 3betting you very light? Were you isolating a lot?