NL200 99 e 88 btn call 3bet e 3 street vs aggro regtard

not sure I like the p/f calls in either hand.

think I might just 4b/call the first one whist your 4bR for him is 6%. Post is always going to be difficult vs an aggressive player as we're going to spend most of every hand bluff catching vs an uncapped range vs someone who is prolly capable of value-betting decently well (most aggro players - even weakers ones are) basically we're going to be guessing.

The second is basically exactly the same hand but his 3bet has dropped to 10% 4bR has dropped to 2.5%, I guess this means he was prolly getting a lot of hands initially, and he is prolly peeling a decent amount of 3bets which actually makes his 4b range a bit more polarised. IDK being in position calling seems quite attractive mainly cos 4b/calling is a little closer and folding seems weak. I guess it would depend how he see's you and if your percieved 4bet range has enough air in as he is obviously capable of 5b/jamming light.

As played they both just sucky bluff-catching spots can't blame either one for being a call but yu really can't call down here everytime thats super, super exploitable, and even bad players can exploit it (he always calls so i'm not going to bluff him etc)

Hate the 1st spot. w/o too much histo going on i like folding the turn.

i think i like your calldown in the 2nd spot as our range is pretty much face up i expect an aggro player to have higher bluffing frequencies in this spot.

4b/call hand one, don't think its very close. CO limped and we isod from the button, he is aggro, just looks like great spot for us to 4b bluff.

Originally posted by pleno1
4b/call hand one, don't think its very close. CO limped and we isod from the button, he is aggro, just looks like great spot for us to 4b bluff.

+1