Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

QQ zoom on SB

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
257 Views
MisClick
Joined: 30.05.2008

Hi,

My question here is about the flop bet. Hand is played v. reg (134 hands)

14/12 3B = 7%

Fold to Cbet 67%

WTSD: 14% (1/7)
W$SD: 0 (1/1)

PokerStars - $0.05 NL ZOOM - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: $3.02
Hero (SB): $7.56
BB: $2.20
UTG: $9.74
UTG+1: $5.62
UTG+2: $6.88
MP: $2.18
MP+1: $3.21
CO: $5.00

Hero posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has Q♠ Q♥

UTG raises to $0.15, fold, UTG+2 calls $0.15, fold, fold, fold, BTN calls $0.15, Hero raises to $0.78, fold, UTG calls $0.63, fold, fold

Flop: ($1.91, 2 players) A♣ 3♥ 3♦
Hero bets $1.15, fold

Hero wins $1.83

My question is
1) What hand is he staying with here? I would assume he would fold ak as he has still 2 payers behind who he doesn't know what they will do, right? I doubt he would 3 bet here when I am showing strength like that and he knows I am not fish.
2) About the flop. If I think he is staying with AK/KK/QQ/JJ preflop. Is it worth betting there? I thought I should always bet as he is most likely to fold anything but AK (once he didnt 3bet KK preflop he will fold to any flop A, QQ,JJ and even if he stays with TT is seing a flop to set mine, right?)

Thanks a lot :heart:

PokerStars - $0.05 NL ZOOM - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: $3.02
Hero (SB): $7.56
BB: $2.20
UTG: $9.74
UTG+1: $5.62
UTG+2: $6.88
MP: $2.18
MP+1: $3.21
CO: $5.00

Hero posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has Q♠ Q♥

UTG raises to $0.15, fold, UTG+2 calls $0.15, fold, fold, fold, BTN calls $0.15, Hero raises to $0.78, fold, UTG calls $0.63, fold, fold

Flop: ($1.91, 2 players) A♣ 3♥ 3♦
Hero bets $1.15, fold

Hero wins $1.83


Reply
Quote
1 reply
veriz
Joined: 20.07.2008

Hello MisClick,

You wont get called from a lot worse hands there and nor I don't see him having KK. I'd Check the flop and let him bluff with weaker holdings.

Best Regards.


Reply
Quote
Share: