Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Nl100 Aa

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
44 Views
axelphoney
Joined: 03.10.2009

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($92.40)
BB ($278)
Hero ($95)
CO ($476)
BTN ($131)

Dealt to Hero A♥ A♣

Hero raises to $3.50, CO raises to $10, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $23, CO calls $13

FLOP ($47.50) 3♣ 6♥ Q♠

Hero checks, CO bets $14, Hero calls $14

TURN ($75.50) 3♣ 6♥ Q♠ 7♥

Hero checks, CO checks

RIVER ($75.50) 3♣ 6♥ Q♠ 7♥ J♠

Hero bets $58 (AI), CO folds

Hero shows A♥ A♣

Hero wins $72.50

villain: 20/18
AF 3.8
WTS: 16
76% fold to cbet flop
50% fold to 4bet (8)
800 hands

Without any reads what line do you prefer here?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
ilares
Joined: 25.10.2009

i think betting 1/3 every street is the best


Reply
Quote
Coach
pleno1
Joined: 19.11.2010

wow this seems quite messed up Axel.

1) Sit 100bbs deep? Is it Ongame?

2) No need for 3.5x, especially 5 handed

3) Just cbet the flop, we can get as much money in as possible, if we bet small he can still spew anyway.

If you wanted to play fancy I would just call the 3bet pre flop, it seems way better than starting to check here.


Reply
Quote
axelphoney Topic starter
axelphoney
Joined: 03.10.2009

Ongame yep.

If none is 3betting a lot, and there are fish at table I don't see any point in making it smaller.

My standard openraisign sizes are usually 3.5bb from UTG-MP and then 3bb from CO, 2BB from BTN (unless there is a fish in the blinds, then I always go for 3bb or even larger in rare cases), 3bB SB.

I didn't think about the hand thoroughly when I played it, but reason for checking was basically that a bet here will look pretty strong whereas if I check he might just stab it with at least one bet, and if he happens to have a queen I will most likely get his whole stack anyway.

Thoughts?


Reply
Quote
Share: