Originally posted by flekozub
Originally posted by lnternet
3betting is almost always better than calling from the SB (with every single hand, yes)
Why?
The whole reasoning is somewhat long winded, Ill just give you the short answer.
If your hand is strong enough to call OOP, without initiate, getting a fair but not good price, it is probably a fairly strong hand. And with that hand, it's certainly also good to 3bet against a wide stealing range.
In general I think it's good to have a SB cold call% of less than 5% overall.
Originally posted by Farmarchist
Is such a riverjam also recommended on small stakes like NL50? Cause I don't think people are more herocall happy there.
If you think you can make the read that your opponent just doesn't call down with many worse hands than AT here, you should go ahead and triple barrel bluff every single holding that you cbet with and that loses to Qx on the river.
Now what I have found watching small stakes players is that they don't jam AT here, thinking they don't get called, but they also don't jam JT, thinking it looks bluffy. And that is inconsistent. (This also explains why smaller stakes games are a bit more passive and higher stakes games are a bit more aggressive.)
It might very well be the case that AT doesn't get called by enough worse hands here, I can't know how the opponent plays. If you know how he plays, you should adjust. But I don't try to make big reads like that, as they are just as often wrong as they are right; if you think you make the right reads all the time you are kidding yourself. Instead I play a strategy that is really solid, and that includes jamming AT, and if he folds hands he shouldn't fold I make up for that with my bluffing range.