Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

22$; 60/40 6max; bb40; A3o steal, facing a ch/r on AT4 6

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
119 Views
wiarygodny
Joined: 16.07.2009

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $40(BB) Replayer
SB ($2,730)
BB ($2,000)
UTG ($1,940)
UTG+1 ($1,980)
CO ($1,410)
Hero ($1,940)

Dealt to Hero 3♦ A♥

fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $100, fold, BB calls $60

FLOP ($220) T♣ A♠ 4♦

BB checks, Hero checks

TURN ($220) T♣ A♠ 4♦ 6♠

BB checks, Hero bets $115, BB raises to $370, Hero calls $255

RIVER ($960) T♣ A♠ 4♦ 6♠ T♦

BB bets $1,530 (AI), Hero folds

BB wins $960

decent reg 21/13/1.7/259, BB vs steal(21): call 43%, 3bet 14%; no particular history

flop standard imo

turn - do you think he's gonna be (semi) bluffing like this often enough for me to call turn and eval river (most likely fold to any further aggression without improving which means that im basically hoping he's gonna give up his bluff once i call turn which i think is a plausible assumption for an average reg)?

maybe instead of flatting turn i should try to read into his sizing since it seems rather big so imo it is most likely a (semi)bluff which means i have to reraise it (or flat and call a blank river)?

or maybe with no history and any particular reads i should have stick to ABC and give him credit for a hand?


Reply
Quote
3 replies

just give him credit and fold to the turn c/r. you only have a bluff catcher, and its unlikely he would take this weird line with a pure bluff.


Reply
Quote
wiarygodny
Joined: 16.07.2009

don't you think that if he happens to have a semibluffing hand on the turn his line is better than if he led the turn himself? Assuming half decent reading skills he knows that after checking this dry board im calling turn 99% of the time but im not calling that often when he ch/raises it. That was basiacally my reasoning behind my turn call.


Reply
Quote

those thoughts are wayyyy too high level. no one thinks that high. (not saying its a bad thing, its good that you are thinking like that.) Just play more relatively standard against mid-stakes regs. They aren't going to be super creative.


Reply
Quote