Originally posted by Shevtshenko
Villain's cbet is low and c/raise is really high, so i'm expecting a c/raise a fair bit on this flop. I would jam flop, since this guy looks like a type to not bluff turn if his c/raise gets called.
Why are we looking at the c/r stat here? We need to know the skip c-bet & r/c/f
We don't have these stats, but they're pretty unreliable anyway, so we shouldn't draw conclusions from that until the sample is very large. If villain smashes the flop there's good reason to think that he might ch/r instead of c-bet, because the texture looks like it might get attacked by the defender if checked to. His range seems strong because it makes no sense that it should be weak, so we should expect it to be strong more often than not.
I think value jamming may be +EV, but the reasoning I don't like at all. We should look at all possible ranges and not put villain on whatever hands we want to. Do we have any reason to suspect villain to play a weak FD this way? Why wouldn't he just c-bet? Then again, if we think a lot of FD's could play this way, why would we shove? Do we think many players will stack off with 97dd?
The most crucial hand that villain needs in his range is KQo. Without it our EV goes way down and we need to be careful not to shove every good looking hand. Villain's 3-bet stat is pretty low from the BB, I see him hit that board quite hard.
I'd call flop. On the turn I'd shove 2-8, T, Q, A and fold diamonds, 9, J, K. We might be able to shove the 9 or fold the 8, but I'd draw the line somewhere so that's what I came up with.