Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Flopped set facing aggression on the river

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
249 Views
benaars
Joined: 03.06.2010

Hello,

I suppose that flop and turn is standard (or maybe sizing a bit wrong?). On the river villain pot donks; I have no reads on him, hes been playing 24/8 small WTSD won both showdowns he went to over 50 hands. Is that good to assume we are always beat here and not to bluff catch that type of player? What if it was more of an aggressive player?

Winamax, $4.50 Buy-in (200/400 blinds, 30 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: 19,940 (49.9 bb)
BB: 21,395 (53.5 bb)
UTG: 16,990 (42.5 bb)
MP: 23,728 (59.3 bb)
Hero (CO): 24,845 (62.1 bb)
BTN: 19,990 (50 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 2 2
2 folds, Hero raises to 800, BTN calls 800, SB folds, BB calls 400

Flop: (2,780) 8 2 Q (3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets 1,350, BTN folds, BB calls 1,350

Turn: (5,480) J (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets 2,900, BB calls 2,900

River: (11,280) 6 (2 players)
BB bets 11,280, Hero ???


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Crrrrrrr
Joined: 13.05.2012

With a flop like this one against a passive villain (at least preflop), you gain money from flush draws, 8x, Qx, and 99+. Same turn (draws, Qx). Does it make sense for a passive player to donk pot with Qx? Not really. Does it make sense to donk pot with his flush draws now that he made the flush? yup.

For me it's a fold. If he didn't bet river, I would have bet/fold for value against Qx and some random Jx. I think he has more combos of Qx/Jx than XXs.


Reply
Quote