Oponent is 51/26, for 160 hands, aggr. 30 / 50/ 54
$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
SB: $50 (100 bb)
BB: $18.59 (37.2 bb)
Hero (MP): $50 (100 bb)
CO: $40.67 (81.3 bb)
BTN: $59.63 (119.3 bb)
Preflop: Hero is MP with A
Q
Hero raises to $1.50, CO calls $1.50, 3 folds
Flop: ($3.75) K 7
6
(2 players)
Hero bets $2, CO calls $2
Turn: ($7.75) Q (2 players)
Hero bets $4.50, CO calls $4.50
River: ($16.75) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $8.38, Hero ?
Check back on the turn is better. Worse hands wont call u (u kind of blocked the draws), moreover by checking u are able to cotrol a pot. If he got worse Q, hes gonna call only one street anyway.
What about his sizing on the river. Did he do that before? It looks strong (especially that we can consider himself a fish). I doubt to see a weak player to pure bluff u out that good.
I agree with the check on turn. We block then FD and the other high cards are on the board. Smaller pairs won't call...
I do not see a problem in the river size, it is exactly 1/2 pot. Nothing strange. I think fold is ok.
So, do we check / call turn and river? Now I think it is way better than turn bet, as villain is aggro and have some bluffs in his range.
