6- Max 10Nl hand review

First, I have moved your thread to our hand discussion board, because it fits better there.

It’s a wet board on the flop and we only beating a flush draw here and I don’t see much hands in his range that would call a 4bet with that has a flush draw with the A♥: out there and I would give him credit for a made hand.

Further I recommend reading the thread https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=267242 and there you can find all useful information to post a hand the appropriate way.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Min 3bet pre, then just calls your 4bet and then raises huge OTF. Villains like looks very weird and is probably very often for value. Imo this looks mostly like weirdly played AA.

It is only 1 combo of AA though.
Villains often min 3b suited hands with Ace or K high card, pp...
Maybe you can think of folding on flop.

Hi ! you can use that http://poker-tools.flopturnriver.com/Hand-Converter.php (select output format 2+2 forums) to make the hand history look like that (it is easier for reviewing and you will get better advice like that):

PokerStars Zoom No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com/

Button ($10.62)
SB ($9.24)
BB ($12.76)
Hero (UTG) ($10)
MP ($10.37)
CO ($17.16)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K♦, A♦
Hero raises to $0.30, 2 folds, Button raises to $0.50, 2 folds, Hero raises to $1.40, Button calls $0.90

Flop: ($2.95) 7♥, A♥, 2♦ (2 players)
Hero bets $1.72, Button raises to $7.98, Hero raises to $8.60 (All-In), Button calls $0.62

Turn: ($20.15) A♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($20.15) 4♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $20.15 | Rake: $0.91

Also, personnaly I am not much tilt resistent so usually I put a stop loss a 3 buy ins by session. That might be a good idea to do something similar

I don't blame you for calling, but let's assume for a minute villain is decent postflop.

Could he raise you for value with anything you beat? AQ? No, because AQ should be seriously worried about you having AK/AA. Flush draws? Surely, but not that many!

The only problem in finding a fold is the assessment villain is decent. It is definitely the case that many villains are indecent preflop and decent postflop. Versus such villains it is detrimental to look at what they could possibly have due to preflop action. They make mistakes preflop knowingly, because they expect to get paid off postflop when the big bets go in. They try to flop big or to steal the pot if they miss. This is actually the way I try to play myself, especially in position, though what happened this hand would a bit loose on part of any villain. But he did get 2.35:0.9 to call the 4-bet, so I wouldn't fault him much either.

Hard to fold in this situation because villain is most likelly not a good player which means that it's more likelly that he is capable of value raising hands like AQ, AJ or AT. Also, he could probably have some worse hands than TP like KK or QQ or some semi-bluffs or pure bluffs. I think it's fine to stack off vs him. When he shows A7, you should definitelly make a note. There is a chance that he 3bets good hands with bigger sizing and worse hands with smaller sizing.

I think so too. I also agree that miraculously villain's are pretty good postflop even though it is the hardest thing to learn IMO I'd call here but know I am often behind in a 3- and especially now 4bet pot.. micro players rarely bluff and even don't raise with marginal value hands in such spots unfortunately. However, my opinion may be a little less in terms of theory but rather as per default play.