PokerStars 8500+1500 - NLHE Tournament (STT, 9-man, Regular) - 50/100 Blinds - 2 players
SB: t7510, 75 BBs (8) VP:62 PFR:0 AF:3.0 3B:0 AS:0 FS:50 CB:0 FC:0 WS:50 W$:100
Hero (BB): t1490, 15 BBs
Preflop: (t150) Hero is BB with A
T ![]()
SB calls t50, Hero ???
Opponent is fish, he limps his SB and calls my raises from BB everytime.
I know i can just check/or limp behind against such opponent but he easily folds post-flop,
however he's stubborn preflop.
I ended up raising 400 and i quite like the play. He commits his money on his most lovely street.
I plan to commit the rest of my money on any but the most wetty flop.
Do you find it a reasonable plan to make him commit money?
Or is just limp/check behind better against these players?
I could as well shove preflop of course but i find they fold easily and i believe my hand crushes him and am eager to take the risk postflop.