Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

KQo SB vs MP Isolating and min-raised OTT

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
918 Views

iPoker - €0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (SB): 129.25 BB
BB: 79.75 BB (VPIP: 56.00, PFR: 2.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 50)
UTG: 141.5 BB (VPIP: 38.71, PFR: 18.28, 3Bet Preflop: 10.00, Hands: 96)
MP: 42 BB (VPIP: 73.17, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 44)
CO: 114.25 BB (VPIP: 22.50, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 40)
BTN: 376.5 BB (VPIP: 27.97, PFR: 22.38, 3Bet Preflop: 12.82, Hands: 145)

Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Q♠ K♦
fold, MP calls 1 BB, fold, fold, Hero raises to 4 BB, fold, MP calls 3 BB

Flop: (9 BB, 2 players) 7♠ A♠ 9♥
Hero bets 5.25 BB, MP calls 5.25 BB

Turn: (19.5 BB, 2 players) J♠
Hero bets 11.5 BB, MP raises to 23 BB, Hero ...?

Villain is extremely loose and passive. No specific post-flop reads.

Pre Flop:
I isolated the limper by raising to 4BB.

Flop:
I'm holding a weak draw hand but decided to c-bet against one passive opponent with 2/3 x pot. I expect Villain to fold low pairs.

Turn:
Villain called so I reduced their range to Ax or draws. I turned my hand to semi-bluff by flying a second 2/3 x pot barrel and I'm faced with a min-raise giving me 4.7:1 odds. What is the best choice here? Can I count my 9 flush outs as well as the 3 straight outs and call or just fold? Would it be better to just check there instead of barreling?


Reply
Quote
4 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

If you give him a range of Ax and draws why do you bet then? Will anything stronger than you fold? What do you want to achieve with that turn bet?


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Pre is ok.

OTF can work as an exploitative move but normally I would not cbet this kind of a hand when out of position. The weaker you think villain is / the more you think he is folding vs a cbet, the smaller you can make it to get better risk-reward ratio.

OTT the problem is that if you think villain will fold a lot OTF, now it means his range is a lot stronger. You need to get some (probably roughly 20%) fold equity. So, if you think villain will now call you very often, then I would prefer just to check.
After you get raised, I think it might be a bit better to fold in this case. I think it would be better to exclude some outs because you have reverse implied odds here. Then take into account the rake and the fact that you described villain as passive -> he will not raise bluff you very often here.


Reply
Quote
CucumbaMan
Joined: 13.10.2017

I think you should fold here. He could easily have a like a 89s, or 910sm which would limp preflop, than call on flop. The problem is that there are not many hands that you can beat here, so I'd just let this one go.


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by nitrol
If you give him a range of Ax and draws why do you bet then? Will anything stronger than you fold? What do you want to achieve with that turn bet?

Good question nitrol, the answer is that in hindsight it looks like I was slightly on tilt and just wanted him to fold OTT without any logic.

Originally posted by la55i
OTT the problem is that if you think villain will fold a lot OTF, now it means his range is a lot stronger. You need to get some (probably roughly 20%) fold equity. So, if you think villain will now call you very often, then I would prefer just to check.
After you get raised, I think it might be a bit better to fold in this case. I think it would be better to exclude some outs because you have reverse implied odds here. Then take into account the rake and the fact that you described villain as passive -> he will not raise bluff you very often here.

Thank's la55i, that's very useful feedback there.

Originally posted by CucumbaMan
I think you should fold here. He could easily have a like a 89s, or 910sm which would limp preflop, than call on flop. The problem is that there are not many hands that you can beat here, so I'd just let this one go.

Quite right CucumbaMan, it looks like I'm beat OTT.


Reply
Quote