# Push or Fold in Heads-up http://www.pokerstrategy.com/strategy/sng/262/
or nash based HU pushes. http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/hune.html
can someone explain in wich they differ. wich is better ♦
# Push or Fold in Heads-up http://www.pokerstrategy.com/strategy/sng/262/
or nash based HU pushes. http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/hune.html
can someone explain in wich they differ. wich is better ♦
Hmmm... no replies... I am interested to know opinions on this as well... Personally I am a fan of Nash here, it's simple and unexploitable...
pretty villain-dependent imo, but nash is never far off ^^
(btw: the push/fold on pokerstrategy should be based on nash aswell? If not: wtf are they based on? :tongue:)
Having reread the PS article I think it is based on adjusted villain ranges so it is usefull in adapting to different types of villains... Nash is the optimal ranges... so, I guess it depends on what you wanna do... you can't go too far wrong with either I suppose...
nash isn't optimal, it's an equilibrium based strategy (there is no better way to play vs a "nash player" then using nash yourself). VS tight players you should still play looser, vs loose players tighter, ...