Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

MP1 vs BB defense

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
604 Views
zetozinho
Joined: 18.06.2017

Hi guys!
Today afternoon was live play day and I played a hand which left me thinking.
Had been on the table for 20/30 min, 9 handed, NL200. From the few hands I saw, no big fishes.

I picked up A♦:Q♠: from MP1, my stack was around 100bb, opened to 3.5bb everyone folded and BB called with a similar stack size.

Flop comes: Q♥:K♠:A♣:, he check/calls my cbet of about 2.5bb on a 7.5bb pot (3.5+3.5+0.5). Standard I would say.

Turn comes the Q♦: and I decided to continue with a 6bb bet on a 12.5bb pot (7.5+2.5+2.5). He check/called again.

River comes the K♣:.
He checks again. I kind of didn't know what to do here. My perceived range is so strong that I don't think there is much worse he will call with. I also don't think a Kx full will check/raise the river when he loses to AA, AK, QQ, KK (which he would block).
I decided to check-back and he showed A♥:J♣:.
Do you think there is merit in betting the river? If so, what size?
Thank you.


Reply
Quote
8 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Only hands you beat is a random Q and Ax except AK. Kx is a better hand as well and is checking back river fine. I don't think he would call with a random Ax and Q on a board like this and is checking fine for sure.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote

Ye i think checking is ok this about the worst villain turns up with so betting for value is pretty thin.Maybe if you bet small enough you can get a little value on the river


Reply
Quote
srichards
Joined: 26.11.2012

I would have 3/4 or full pot betted the Flop. It was wise to slow up on the River. That King was quite scary. However if he shoved the River, how would you have responded?


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Originally posted by srichards
I would have 3/4 or full pot betted the Flop. It was wise to slow up on the River. That King was quite scary. However if he shoved the River, how would you have responded?

Half poton flop seems big enough on a NL200 game or you deal with a fish. If he would shove the river I would make a fold. You have 1 of the weaker full houses on this board.


Reply
Quote
Ruudbolink92
Joined: 24.03.2019

Pke


Reply
Quote
Zeta
Joined: 10.03.2006

Agree, I like his smaller betsize on the flop. River is a clear check behind. Close to no worst hand will call a bet here and you open yourself up to a really bad spot if you bet and villain raises imho.


Reply
Quote
zetozinho
Joined: 18.06.2017

Originally posted by srichards
I would have 3/4 or full pot betted the Flop. It was wise to slow up on the River. That King was quite scary. However if he shoved the River, how would you have responded?

I guess fold with no further info. I have better full-houses, although I think that shoving this river vs my perceived range would be a weird move from a regular (I don't if villain was a regular btw).


Reply
Quote
srichards
Joined: 26.11.2012

Originally posted by zetozinho

Originally posted by srichards
I would have 3/4 or full pot betted the Flop. It was wise to slow up on the River. That King was quite scary. However if he shoved the River, how would you have responded?

I guess fold with no further info. I have better full-houses, although I think that shoving this river vs my perceived range would be a weird move from a regular (I don't if villain was a regular btw).

Certainly a reasonable fold facing a river shove. I probably would have called without confidence.


Reply
Quote