Note before reading: my stack is "refilled" to 100bbs only when I'm bellow 85
Villain is 13/9 nit in 500 hands.
PokerStars - €0.10 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 134.7 BB
SB: 229.6 BB
BB: 99.4 BB
UTG: 114.2 BB
MP: 101.5 BB
Hero (CO): 91 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has A♠ A♥
UTG raises to 3.5 BB, fold, Hero raises to 11 BB, fold, fold, fold, UTG calls 7.5 BB
Flop: (23.5 BB, 2 players) 9♥ 9♠ K♥
UTG checks, Hero checks
Turn: (23.5 BB, 2 players) 6♣
UTG checks, Hero bets 12 BB, UTG calls 12 BB
River: (47.5 BB, 2 players) Q♦
UTG bets 91.2 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 68 BB and is all-in
Spoiler
UTG shows K♣ K♦ (Full House, Kings full of Nines)
(Pre 19%, Flop 91%, Turn 95%)
Hero shows A♠ A♥ (Two Pair, Aces and Nines)
(Pre 81%, Flop 9%, Turn 5%)
UTG wins 174.3 BB
Pf is standard.
Flop, I checked behind because I need to have some hands in my checking range ip in a 3bet pot, and this one is sometimes one of it, especially with the ace of hearts.
Turn, with a blank and another check from the nit I narrowed his range to TT+, AK and maybe (but unlikely) AQ and KQs, that's why I decided to go for 1/2 pot bet.
OTR I was like.. JT is impossible, it's KQ or AK.. or QQ of course!... 99 very unlikely and KK would probably stab that turn after my check ONF. I guess the villain is even "nitter" than I thought and he got me good. Anyways, it's worth the note 
What do you think about it? Would you call it? What you'd have done different? Thanks!
