Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

AA trying to induce a bluff OTR

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
385 Views
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

PokerStars - $0.02 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 113.5 BB
SB: 113.5 BB
Hero (BB): 124.5 BB
UTG: 183 BB
MP: 187 BB
CO: 100 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Q♥:A♠:

UTG raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls 2 BB

Flop: (6.5 BB, 2 players) A♣:Q♠:7♥:
Hero checks, UTG bets 6 BB, Hero raises to 15.5 BB, UTG calls 9.5 BB

Turn: (37.5 BB, 2 players) 9♦:
Hero bets 18.5 BB, UTG calls 18.5 BB

River: (74.5 BB, 2 players) A♥:
Hero ??? OK fine -- I have the stone cold nuts I thought that only Ax would call, but I also thought that a lot of hands -- worse full houses could easily bet the river, and which point I would raise.

Does anyone ever check this river looking to induce a bluff? Or a "value bet" from worse?


Reply
Quote
4 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Depending on the villain of this hand, but against a unknown on NL2 I prefer the Cbet on the river for value.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Yeah -- I was thinking the same -- perhaps a small bet.
He actually checked back this...

River: (74.5 BB, 2 players) A♥:
Hero checks, UTG checks

Hero shows Q♥:A♠: (Full House, Aces full of Queens)
(Pre 74%, Flop 91%, Turn 95%)
UTG mucks 7♠:A♦: (Full House, Aces full of Sevens)
(Pre 26%, Flop 9%, Turn 5%)
Hero wins 72 BB
Rake paid 2.5 BB

So he might have called almost anything


Reply
Quote
pokerplayernumber1
Joined: 05.06.2010

Just bet big, you can still have JT (at least in his eyes)


Reply
Quote
mjez1
Joined: 29.06.2015

From my experience on NL2 it's better go for value than try to induce a bluff.
Sometimes it's more profitable to check/raise but I don't see this board suitable for it.


Reply
Quote