Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO50 Q998ds triple barrel line

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
498 Views
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

No reads beside villain limping few times.

Flop is standard cbet but I always feel bit unsure how often we should continue on blank turn like this? We do pick up more equity so its pretty nice to barrel. My plan was to fold in case villain x-raise pot.

In river we do block some draws but there is also bunch of stuff in villain range that beat my hand. Imo I get lot of credit in this spot and usually not getting called by less than trips. Potentially could also use smaller sizing like half pot as there is some potential AA, KK type hands in my range that probably dont want to pot if value betting.

Game #2021081068: Table €50 PL - 0.25/0.50 - Pot Limit Omaha - 10:43:27 2024/01/12
Seated players
Seat 2: Saminu (€64.92)
Seat 3: Rikysim (€24.50)
Seat 4: salty123 (€79.57)
Seat 5: Ru1n (€60.88)
Seat 6: Bi-tch (€0) (sitting out)
Blinds and button
Saminu has the button
Rikysim posts small blind €0.25
salty123 posts big blind €0.50
Hole cards
Dealt to Saminu 9♣:9♥:8♣:Q♥:
Preflop
Ru1n calls €0.50
Saminu raises €2.25 to €2.25
Rikysim folds
salty123 folds
Ru1n calls €1.75
Flop J♥:2♣:8♠: (5.25€)
Ru1n checks
Saminu bets €3.93
Ru1n calls €3.93
Turn 5♣: (13.11€)
Ru1n checks
Saminu bets €13.11
Ru1n calls €13.11
River 2♦: (39.33€)
Ru1n checks
Saminu bets €39.33


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Preflop raise is pretty standard. The flop cbet is a mix between betting and checking imo but the more weak or passive villain is, the more we are inclined to bet and the limp in the first place is an indicator of such, but in general the factors of betting or not contradict each other quite balanced imo. Solver would bet here but trying to figuring out the motives, I cannot see a clear pattern or reasoning behind it. To be balanced ourself with those hand categories we´d probably need some randomizers or side-card rules of thumb which hands to bet and which to check.

The turn did not change much, it brings some draws and improves our Equity, whereas it was marginal otf now it is a clear follow-up semi-bluff barrel ott. Our 2-barreling frequency is around 55-60%. This does not change much when then the turn is an unsuited blank. But if the turn is a brick completing the straight or pairing the board we have to step down a bit from 2barreling like decrease to 40%. Equity is Nr.1 reason to bet (so we have some value but barely SDV and FE with pair-blocker and future blockers)

We are always around 55-60% frequency without a texture shift. Solver barrels 75% on any card but there are many reasons advocating to just pot it (or vary sizings depending on if it is static or not), I already mentioned the reasons for it in previous discussions. Folding to a check-raise makes sense without nuttiness and having low visibility and all the draw blockers and with the tendency of underbluffing in that spot.

River pairing up improving made-hand values and busting draws. If the majority of our hole cards (beside the 8♣: which has some minor blocking effects on villains strong made hands) speaks against a bluff together with the fact we still have some SDV and significant draw blockers - it is definitely a check-back otr.


Reply
Quote
Share: