56 suited , what could I have done different here?

I would most likely fold pre-flop against a 3,4x raise from UTG from the SB.
Flop play seems standard and on the turn I would most likely shove or just call with the flush, but that's villain depended. It's not to hard to get the money in the middle on the river if it's a blank. I don't min raise that often, but after the 3bet shove of villian I would iso with a shove. Now raising without shoving makes no sense.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Lately, I've noticed more frequent steals of 3.5 to 4 times the big blind from the button or small blind, and 56 suited is a speculative hand that can be played post-flop. If you decide to call, you're accepting that you're opening yourself up to a wide range of variance.All you can say is "nice hand sir " next time .

This was a raise from UTG. That should be a tighter range than from the BTN, but it looks like villain is just pot raising without thinking about sizing and ranges. Normally I would raise 2,5x or so from UTG and min raise from the BTN without limpers in the pot. Post-flop is indeed a cooler I think with the flush over flush, but if you see the actual hands it's really specultative what both villains are doing.

Fold pre unless one of guys is huge whale. On turn I would only call, low flushes need to played carefully in multiways.
If I raise and see this:
BB raises to 68 BB and is all-in, UTG calls 49.2 BB,
Then I'm done with this hand. Its very likely you are running against higher flush there.