So hyper-aggressive brm would suggest that you "attack" the "market" fast, attempting to get a big piece of it fast. But now i am recommended this better and slower brm. I recognize, also in business and sports career life, i might have used too aggressive style that tries to crush the already existing competition. It is fun but has some flaws (conflicts, difficulties, etc). So i think about moving to less aggression also in career. what are your thoughts
Notifications
Clear all
2 replies
Not sure what the question is.
BRM is a tool, and when you know what you are trying to achieve with it, you know how to use it. In short, we have mathematical and psychological approach to BRM. Common goals for BRM is to prevent losing all money or get to certain stakes as fast as possible. For the first, passive BRM approach is better and for the later the aggressive approach is better.
Mathematical BRM is easy to calculate, psychological aspect is harder as it requires some self evaluating. Like if you lose half of your bankroll in a day, how does that affect you mentally? Psychologically, the bigger your bankroll is the better it is.
There are no right or wrong answers to BRM. But in good BRM you know why you are using it and therefore what is the best approach for you.
I think I shouldn't override other people that aggressively in my life and rather listen what they say as much as possible, and could also convert to "less-breakthrough" and more "passive" and slow BRM in online poker. Too much aggression could lead to unknown and risky situations. We are free to choose the less aggressive approach, right? In the past in my region extremely aggressive brm was hyped but i went even more aggressive than that. Now I am converting towards more normal and slow approach.